Global warming is contributing to the increased incidence of extreme weather nationwide. There has been a steep rise in the number storms causing flooding throughout the country and the past few days of torrential rain have seen terrible floods in the south, and even in the north some streets were turned into rivers. It really is quite disturbing.
On June 5 and June 6, a Conference on Global Climate Change was held, something the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) had been planning since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) first promised it two years ago. It was a major conference, with Ma in attendance, listening to reports presented by civic groups and government departments.
The conference focused on nine issues, divided into four major categories; disasters, essential infrastructure, land use and coastal areas; agricultural production and biodiversity; water resources, energy supply and production; and education on health and the environment.
Confusingly, despite all this clamor, there was no mention of forestry management issues such as soil and water conservation or carbon credits. That is to say, the role of forestry in climate change was ignored. As a result, we are bound to ask whether a conference on climate change that fails to broach the forestry departments’ policies for reducing and managing greenhouse gases is worthy of the name.
Second, climate change is a global issue. All too often, Taiwanese people’s concept of environmental protection on issues such as the disposal of nuclear waste or the construction of a new plant by Kuokuang Petrochemical Technology Co extends only as far as objecting to pollution generated within their county.
Unfortunately, This view of environmental protection sits quite happily with the idea of polluting others.
We are already in the era of the Global Village. Take the forests, for example. Taiwan relies on imports for more than 99 percent of its forestry products and yet we have precious little idea whether these products comply with sustainability guidelines or contribute to the unlawful felling of trees in other mountainous regions worldwide.
These are important issues and yet they were entirely absent from the conference. Despite this, Minister of the Interior Lee Hong-yuan (李鴻源) still took the time to blame environmental groups for not supporting the government’s policy of increasing oil and electricity prices, a criticism that was ill-considered and entirely missed the point.
We have to change the way we think about environmental issues. This is particularly true because, as global climate change shows, everything is interlinked. Humans are, by nature, selfish, and it is extremely difficult for us to think beyond merely protecting our immediate surroundings, and to think instead in terms of the Earth as a whole. However, there are those who do care and are willing to make the effort. The Taiwan Green Belt Movement initiated by the Environmental Quality Protection Foundation is just one example.
The Rio+20 UN Conference on Sustainable Development starts in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, today and runs until Friday. Hopefully, in the future there will be more sustainable and practical initiatives underway in Taiwan.
What we do not want to see is an increase in conferences that debate the issues back and forth, but never actually get anything done.
Liu Hsiao-yu is a research fellow and director of the administration department at the Environmental Quality Protection Foundation.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under