TODAY, world leaders will gather in Brazil for the Rio+20 summit to decide what kind of future we want. Twenty years after the original Earth summit in the same city, the theme is the green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication.
Why is the conference important and why the aspirations for a “green economy”? A green economy is one that results in improved well-being and social equity, while significantly reducing environmental risks and ecological scarcities. Growth in a green economy is driven by investments that reduce pressures on the environment and the services it provides us with, while enhancing energy and resource efficiency.
Or put simpler, to quote an African diplomat: It is our own survival strategy.
The green economy is a means to sustainable development; a strategy to get prosperity for people and the planet, today and tomorrow. There can be no sustainable development without social equity; no growth without proper management of the natural resources our economies depend on. We need sustainable development to achieve prosperity for many instead of misery for all.
We have made quite some progress since 1992, but clearly not enough. Millions are still hungry every day. If we carry on using resources at the current rate, by 2050 we will need the equivalent of more than two planets to sustain us and the aspirations of many for a better quality of life will not be reached.
The poorest in our societies will suffer most if we use our resources unsustainably as their lives and livelihoods depend very directly on water, land, seas, forests and soil. There are new and emerging challenges that pose a serious threat to sustainable development — from climate change and increasing water scarcity and to low resilience to natural disasters and biodiversity and ecosystem loss.
However, we have the tools to tackle these challenges and turn them into opportunities. Many countries can leapfrog to efficient technologies and systems that will permit them to exploit their resources, from forests and biodiversity to land and minerals, in ways that are sustainable and capable of supporting increases in consumption. Between 70 and 85 percent of opportunities to boost resource productivity are estimated to be in developing countries. Nations that learn to use their natural capital in a smart and sustainable way today, will be the winners of tomorrow. The transformation to a greener economy could generate 15 to 60 million additional jobs globally over the next two decades and lift tens of millions out of poverty, according to a report by the International Labour Organization.
This is why the EU will continue to fight for Rio+20 to result in a focused and ambitious outcome. We want to start something that has real impact on people’s lives. This is a conference about people; about us, about our future. We have suggested goals for key natural resources which underpin a green economy: water, the oceans, land and ecosystems, forests, sustainable energy and resource efficiency including waste. These goals are essential for sustainable growth and inextricably linked to the issues of food security, poverty reduction and social development. These goals would drive the private sector to invest, spur technological innovation and create employment. One of the desired outcomes of Rio is that all listed and large private companies should include sustainability in their annual reporting, or explain why they do not. The World Bank has already launched an initiative where companies would use natural accounting mechanisms in their statistics. This could be the start of a new reality, where natural capital counts and sustainability has value, but it is clear change will not happen without everyone on board. Not only will politicians need to be convinced — but businesses, civil society and individuals also need to be involved.
While many countries are in better shape today compared to twenty years ago, the world’s poorest will still need help getting access to education, the right infrastructure and skills. This is why the EU remains the biggest donor of aid in the world. Last year we gave 53 billion euros (US$66.9 billion) in development aid — more than half of the aid gifted by the entire world, and this is why we will stick to our promises. Despite the current financial crisis, the EU countries recently reaffirmed this commitment which would translate into important additional development aid by 2015, including for projects related to the Rio outcome.
So, what kind of future do we want? Here’s the answer from 17-year old Brittany Trilford from New Zealand, winner of the Future We Want competition and who will address leaders in Rio: “Frankly, I’d be happy to just have a future. To have that guaranteed. Right now, it’s not.”
It is not only about the future of Brittany’s generation and generations to come. It is already about us; it is our own future we put at stake if we fail to tackle the problems. Let’s not waste our chance to choose the kind of future we want — while we still can.
Janez Potocnik is the EU environment commissioner.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under