There is nothing unusual about a governing party and the opposition having their differences. This is no excuse, however, for them refusing to meet and sort out these differences. On Thursday, Minister of the Interior Lee Hong-yuan (李鴻源) met representatives from environmental groups in what was an example of how this should be done.
There had initially been some tension between the two sides, as Lee had criticized environmental groups for not supporting the government’s fuel and electricity price increase policy. The groups replied, through the media, that Lee had got his wires crossed and Lee then invited them to a meeting. To all appearances, it had all the makings of being quite a fraught occasion.
As it turned out, despite the differences of opinion, the atmosphere at the debate was affable. The groups kept to their positions that the price increases had little to do with energy conservation or environmental protection and simply reflected the losses accrued by CPC Corp, Taiwan and Taiwan Power Co (Taipower). As a result, they said, there was no reason to support the policy.
Lee conceded their basic point. In the end, Green Consumers’ Foundation chairman Jay Fang (方儉) suggested that if Lee were to show a commitment to carbon disclosure over the next year, the environmental groups would be more than willing to help out. Lee promised to cooperate. From what could have been a tense meeting, the two sides succeeded in communicating meaningfully with each other and in generating a constructive plan of action. It was a real swords-to-plowshares moment.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has done quite well in this regard in his relations with Beijing, but relations between domestic political parties are pretty frosty, and have been for some time. For four years now, Ma has been talking of meeting with opposition leaders. While it was no surprise that he had little to do with former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), he did not have much to do with the pan-blue People First Party either. He recently broached the subject again, but nothing came of it and DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) accused him of playing politics.
There are several reasons for the breakdown in communication between the governing and opposition parties. First of all, Ma is too interested in appearances. He wants any meeting with opposition leaders to be held in a public forum, TV cameras present, with himself in the capacity of president, with the stated aim of reaching a consensus — like some kind of formal meeting between two national leaders. This poses too many complications, with too many factors that can go wrong.
Second, politics is always going to get in the way. There is little love lost between the government and opposition and each side will approach any meeting intent on political point-scoring. There is just too little room for agreement or concession.
Third, it is far from clear that Ma will be going into any meeting with a genuine desire for communication. As president and chairman of the governing party, he holds all the cards and he is not going to want to compromise or concede anything to the opposition. He lacks the mentality to see the benefit of communication taking place at all. It is no surprise, then, that talks on holding a meeting never go beyond the preliminary stages between intermediaries.
Ma admitted during a recent press conference that the government could be doing much better on the communication side of things, and yet he has done nothing to change the way he communicates with the legislature or the opposition.
As the president of a democratic country, this certainly is his biggest flaw. If Ma really wants to improve this, it is really quite simple: All he needs to do is pick up the phone and call Su and ask him how he is doing. Then things might change.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry