At the upcoming Rio+20 Earth Summit in Brazil, more than 135 heads of state and government, and up to 50,000 participants, including business executives and civil-society representatives, will come together to express their collective commitment to advance inclusive, sustainable development. However, despite the goal of unity and collective action underpinning the summit, the best way forward for the global economy is to build on the actions that individual countries and regions are taking in pursuit of their own interests.
Despite the summit’s aspirational rhetoric, there is no consensus about how to achieve sustainable development, exemplified by disagreement over the potential of “green growth.” Advocates argue that “clean tech,” “smart financing” and “investment-grade” public policies will usher in a new and enlightened era of economic growth that does not degrade the environment. However, for opponents, green growth is more like “green-washed growth” — a merely cosmetic change to the business-as-usual approach that gave us the global financial crisis, perpetuates poverty and exacerbates inequality.
Given this divergence, policymakers must grasp today’s immediate opportunities, rather than rely on the desirable — but remote — possibility of global consensus. Counting on today’s resource-intensive, profit-driven world economy to deliver quickly the global public goods of environmental security and development requires profound optimism, especially given the dire political and economic circumstances of key powers, notably Europe and the US.
Capital markets’ shortsightedness — on plain display in recent years — does little to raise hopes. Although investment in clean technology is on the rise, it is far from reaching the more than US$1 trillion a year needed to deliver green energy and infrastructure fit for the 21st century.
Robust policy interventions are needed, but global policy platforms are in disarray. The WTO oversees a trade regime that is antagonistic to the economic and industrial strategies that are needed to bring green technology to scale. Global climate negotiators lack the mandate, incentive and competencies to reach a much-needed consensus that facilitates economic transformation.
GREEN CHANGES
Yet today’s global economy is all we have, so we need to make the most of it in driving forward the green changes that are needed. That means taking advantage of unilateral action by individual countries or regional groupings to put the global economy on a more sustainable path.
Some useful policies are already in play — China’s massive public subsidies are powering up a cadre of internationally minded clean-tech companies; Europe is attempting to extend its carbon-trading scheme to non-European airlines; and the US is moving toward energy security through domestic shale-gas exploitation.
Moreover, many less developed countries, anxious to secure for themselves a place in tomorrow’s global economic order, are taking unilateral action to seize links of the global value chains of low-carbon industries, notably renewables.
Rather than seeking to contain this unilateralism, world leaders should leverage it in pursuit of global public good. Such a strategy’s success depends on three factors — a focus on a small number of big-ticket national and regional actions; adequate policy leverage over these actions; and international coalitions to steer them along a legitimate path.
One area to target is sovereign wealth funds, whose combined assets are set to grow over the next decade from between US$3 trillion and US$4 trillion to US$10 trillion. Furthermore, governments procure roughly US$3 trillion to US$4 trillion of goods and services annually, a huge potential force for inducing market transformation. Fossil-fuel subsidies exceed US$400 billion annually, while the yearly total for public subsidies of natural resources is estimated to exceed US$1 trillion. China alone will increase its level of outward direct investment over the next decade by an estimated US$1 trillion — a gift to sustainability if its deployment can be shaped with such a vision in mind.
COLLABORATIONS
Shaping unilateralism requires new ways to collaborate and such platforms are emerging. The US-sponsored Clean Energy Ministerial, the Abu Dhabi-based renewable-energy agency, IRENA, and the South Korean-initiated Global Green Growth Institute can provide pragmatic pathways for enhancing unilateral action.
A new generation of public-private partnerships is also focused on unlocking strategic green-growth opportunities. Many of the most promising partnerships are profiled at the Danish-led Global Green Growth Forum and they include coalitions on greening public procurement, advancing a “sustainable-energy trade zone” and addressing fossil-fuel subsidies worldwide.
In its current state, the global economy is unfit to serve today’s collective needs, let alone tomorrow’s. Capital markets must be reformed, not only to ensure that they are resilient — the focus of financial-market reform nowadays — but also to guarantee that money is allocated in ways that secure the resilience of the real economy and the natural environment on which we depend. Meanwhile, policymakers must take advantage of concentrated, policy-directed economic assets to catalyze a greener, more sustainable economic transformation.
The most powerful forces in today’s global political economy are unilateral decisions taken by countries and regional groups in pursuit of their own economic interests. These are forces that should be leveraged through international collaboration aimed at enhancing such decisions’ national effectiveness and their contribution to addressing the provision of global public good.
Those attending the Rio+20 summit should embrace this promising, if awkward, strategic opportunity.
Simon Zadek is a senior fellow at the Global Green Growth Institute and an associate senior adviser at the International Institute of Sustainable Development.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Taiwan is the master of its own fate, yet the remnants and values of its colonial past still haunt the nation. The issue is not limited to Taiwan, but rather a phantasm that exists in all postcolonial states. The phenomenon is in apparent in several nations following their independence. Early examples include former Central and South American colonies once ruled by Spain, Portugal and France, and more recently Asian and African nations that gained independence after World War II. The road to democracy is not a smooth one. Most elites in such countries were educated during colonial periods. Once their nation gains independence,