Since President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) re-election in January, consumer prices have continued to rise while the stock market has continued to fall. The TAIEX has shed more than 1,000 points over the past three months, losing more than NT$1 trillion (US$33.4 billion) in value. Deducing the reason for this decline is not very difficult: It is due to the impact of the combined rise in fuel prices and impending hike in electricity rates as well as the European debt crisis. Another crucial reason is the proposed controversial capital gains tax on securities transactions, as can be seen by wild fluctuations in the stock market and the presence of five different proposals for the tax.
Obviously, the proposal of the capital gains tax in the name of reform is far from the government’s goal of promoting fairness and justice. While the government still appears to be pushing the tax, it is poised to fail. If we look at the tax in terms of a medical prescription, the government has made two mistakes.
First, this powerful medication is too heavy for a weak patient. The local stock market is not very healthy to begin with and it is rife with opportunistic speculative retail investors. That means that if there is the slightest commotion causing big investors to pull out, retail investors often follow. When news first broke in February of plans to revive an attempt from 1988 to introduce a capital gains tax on securities transactions, the government immediately vowed to “get the big investors.” Then-finance minister Christina Liu (劉憶如) repeatedly brought up Hon Hai Precision Industry chairman Terry Gou (郭台銘) as an example, talking about how much money he has made on the stock market and how little tax he had to pay on his gains. This unnerved investors, and as a result both volume and prices declined, causing 90 percent of small retail investors to sustain losses.
In traditional medicine, doctors treat a patient carefully and slowly administer mild medication to gradually improve the patient’s condition. They should never give strong medication because the patient’s body may not be able to cope. The proposed tax is unquestionably akin to powerful medication applied to an unhealthy stock market, thus hurting, rather than curing, the patient.
Second, the government is applying the medicine at the wrong time. Before the capital gains tax comes into effect, Taiwan will have to sustain the impact of domestic fuel and electricity rate increases as well as the full-blown European debt crisis internationally, placing the local stock market under a two-pronged attack. These circumstances should make it clear that the implementation of any tax on profits would have a big impact on the local bourse. This should have been a warning for caution, but instead the Ministry of Finance chose to resolutely push for the tax, while the Presidential Office has taken a firm stance against its withdrawal.
If the proposed tax really is the right remedy, a physician should know when to apply it to cure the illness and avoid any side effects. An allergy medication used in traditional medicine, sanfutie (三伏貼), for example, should be applied at proper times or it would be ineffective and even potentially harmful. The government, however, did not consider the timing because it was in a hurry to impose the tax. This is a big taboo when applying medication.
A good politician is like a good doctor. They should follow the same principle to “observe, listen, inquire and take the pulse,” adapting the remedy to the illness after determining the cause. Rushing to issue a prescription with disregard of the seriousness of the illness or the nature of the medication will cause even a healthy patient to fall ill.
Hsu Yu-fang is an associate professor in the department of sinophone literatures at National Dong Hwa University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry