The coming of the Black Death to 14th century Europe meant the church needed someone to blame. Since God was exonerated ex officio, the obvious culprit was human sin, though some theologians favored Mongolian hordes, the waning power of Rome, not enough austerity and the alarming junction of Mars and Saturn in Aquarius. No one thought it was just a plague.
The same is true of today’s Black Death: the euro crisis. Pundits attribute its woes to wicked debt, insufficient austerity and the need for more power to Brussels. Were Geoffrey de Meaux alive today, he would also blame Venus’ transit of the sun. As in the 14th century, these wiseacres assure us that redemption will come from giving more control to superior authority and from a more drastic austerity than any yet attempted. National self-flagellation is also much recommended.
As for the euro, like the black rat, it gets off scot-free. It survives every debacle as that apogee of dogma, a “good idea in principle.” A generation of European politicians have worshipped at its shrine and they are now too old to recant. To be “for” the euro was to be progressive, international, indulgent of the rich and munificent to the poor. It was a symbol of futurist sophistication, waved like a holy rood in the face of crabby, narrow-minded euroskeptics.
I remember attending an EU conference in Luxembourg in the early 1990s and questioning the aptness of a common currency to a continent of widely diverging economies. A look of horror crossed every face, as if I had questioned the virgin birth and resurrection in one. Could I not understand that a single currency would “level up” the whole European economy to match German efficiency? It would force the weak to become competitive. It was the cement that would bind a European superstate.
Those whom history proves right are warned never to cheer. It is always “too soon to tell.” But when I think back to the smugness of those well-fed, unaccountable, untaxed Eurocrats, I am not surprised at their aloofness in still wanting to inflict their dogma on hapless Greece and Spain. How else could the untaxed IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde stand up and accuse Greeks of not paying taxes?
A currency fashioned to enrich German exporters and ensnare Mediterranean nations in German credit was never going to work. Single currency zones are fragile, short-lived constructs. Their supranational governors must enforce equalization of labor costs, or tax and cross-subsidize on a massive scale. It is a short route to German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s fatal concept of German commissars in Athens’ ministries.
From the moment the euro entered circulation in 2002, the eurozone’s collapse was only a matter of time. Yet its authors still deny its faults, intoning the need for more austerity and more indebtedness through new eurobonds. At its core remains the heaving ghost of an undervalued deutschmark. The German financial-industrial complex is as dependent on the euro as the US military-industrial is on war.
Humankind, said TS Eliot, cannot stand too much reality. An intriguing debate on the euro took place last week on the BBC’s Newsnight, between two US economists, Paul Krugman and Ken Rogoff. Once the BBC’s in-house pundits had departed screeching “inconceivable ... catastrophe ... disaster,” the two men got down to business.
Both conceded that the euro had not worked in practice and that the scale of European debt was unmanageable. It had to be written off or down, or eroded by inflation. Demand had to be stimulated if growth was to return. Then Rogoff headed for the hills. He demanded a fiscally “united states of Europe” to force competitiveness on weaker states. This is the current US answer to every world problem — “if only” everywhere were more like the US. For Rogoff, a Napoleonic statism was the only answer to Europe’s woes.
Krugman asked what was the point of advocating something that was simply not going to happen. Even if the Greeks next week vote for a pro-bailout government and the Germans tolerate a Spanish rescue, this would not save the situation. The Mediterranean economies were wholly uncompetitive. Spanish wage rates would have to halve. No amount of annual bailouts would save millions from economic strangulation.
Krugman’s answer was to accept what has, until recently, been called “unthinkable” — the departure of Greece and perhaps Spain from the euro. They should revert to their pre-2002 status, free to devalue and adjust their prices to reality, as does Britain. They should inflate their way back to growth. Since the same might sooner or later apply to Italy, Portugal and Ireland, a reconfiguration of the euro must be contemplated, warts and all. Code for this is that it be “orderly,” which is like a man adjusting his dress before execution. Krugman won the day for realism.
There is no point in pundits moaning about Europe’s interdependence, its open borders, its migrants, its grants and its cross-subsidies. They were handled before the euro came into existence 10 years ago. Nor should the euro be blamed for indebtedness as such, though its supposed security made debt more available and its insecurity now makes debt awesomely expensive. The reality is that a quarter of the Greek and Spanish labor forces are unemployed, with other states possibly to follow. The euro stands four square across the path to devaluation and recovery.
This is a dreadful price for any country to pay for the ambitions and dogmas of a generation of European leaders so detached from accountability that no national referendum on the euro would pass. Nor is it a price that another bailout will do more than postpone. There will be no end to these annual fiascos unless debts can be devalued and national economies brought into stable equilibrium. Do ministers really want these weekly summits to go on forever?
To enslave the peoples of southern Europe in perpetual poverty for 10 years of slothfulness under the euro is not just cruel, it is an economic sanction more savage than anything visited on Iran, Syria or Zimbabwe. It is now hurting us all. As the historian Barbara Tuchman once said, even intelligent people seem incapable of learning from the errors of the past. The euro was a ghastly mistake, yet no one in power has the guts to say so — let alone make amends.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations