Is Jeremy Lin Taiwanese?
Is basketball star Jeremy Lin (林書豪) a Republic of China (ROC) national? The Ministry of the Interior (MOI) says yes, but what are the views of other government departments? (“Jeremy Lin is legally an ROC national: official,” June 7, page 1)
This discussion brings to mind the situation of children with one foreign parent. Before 2000, children born to mixed-nationality parents could only claim ROC nationality if the father had an ROC ID card. An ROC mother could not transmit her nationality to her child. On Feb. 9, 2000, the Nationality Law (國籍法) was revised to make male and female parents equal in this regard. The law gave a 20-year retroactive provision so that children born to ROC mothers who had not reached the age of 20 by Feb. 9, 2000, could also obtain ROC nationality.
A mixed-nationality couple (Taiwanese mother and US father) of my acquaintance had a son who was 17 years old in 2000, studying in a local school, and who was carrying an Alien Resident Certificate which identified him as a US citizen. At that time, the parents were applying for a scholarship from an organization in the US, and needed to prove that the child only had “single nationality.” They applied to the ministry for such a determination. However the ministry sent them an official letter which stated that their child had automatically obtained ROC nationality due to the legal changes of Feb. 9, 2000.
Doubting the legality of the ministry’s determination, the parents decided to have their son’s nationality status updated with the educational authorities, the local tax department, the Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI), and the Bureau of Entry and Exit (BEE). They wrote full explanations and included the official letter from the ministry saying that their son now had ROC nationality.
However, the replies from the education and finance ministries, the BEE and the BNHI all denied their requests. The officials from these agencies all stated that it was necessary to produce documentary evidence of ROC nationality (minimally: an ID card) to be granted “local citizen” status to enrol in a Taiwanese school, enter or leave the country, claim the “local” withholding rate for taxes, enrol in the National Health Insurance program as a Taiwanese, and so on.
In the case of Lin, I strongly doubt that other government departments agree with the interior ministry’s proclamation that he is “automatically” an ROC national. Hence, I would argue the ministry’s determination is ridiculous.
Certainly, no one would argue that by going to driving school six times and passing all the written, oral and on-road tests a person “is now legally qualified to drive a car.” It is necessary to go to the Department of Motor Vehicles, take the test there and obtain the relevant certification.
There is a difference between “meeting the qualifications” and “obtaining the certification.” MOI officials fail to understand this. I feel confident that the majority of government departments would not agree with the interior ministry’s determination that Lin has ROC nationality.
Would the MOI care to make a response?
Name withheld
Make points politely
If one said to Georg Woodman (Letters, June 5, page 8): “Although you are a pompous ass, you make many salient and inarguable points,” my guess is the compliment at the end would be overshadowed by the insult at the beginning. Taiwanese and maybe most people would feel this way about such a statement.
I agree with almost every point Woodman made, but forming his argument in such combative and insulting terms produces very few results. It is not talking down to someone or condescending to present your arguments respectfully.
As an example, I could not count the times I swore in an incomprehensible blur of English and Chinese insults at drivers who had not turned on their headlights, despite near pitch darkness. The outcomes have been less than optimal.
However, whenever I have asked nicely and explained it is for their safety as well as the safety of others, not only was I thanked, but, more importantly, they complied.
It feels good to rant and vent and we all need to do it sometimes, but the day we lose the patience and forbearance to deliver the message in a manner befitting its value, is the day we are old men shouting down an empty hallway.
I make an exception for issues of public safety. Then manners go out the window and the police should do the talking for you. Keeping the local police station’s number on hand is a must.
Aaron Andrews
Greater Taichung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry