The problem with living through a revolution is that you have no idea how things will turn out. So it is with the revolutionary transformation of our communications environment driven by the Internet and mobile phone technology.
Strangely, our problem is not that we are short of data about what’s going on — on the contrary we are awash with the stuff. This is what led Manuel Castells, the great academic of cyberspace, to describe our current mental state as one of “informed bewilderment.” We have lots of information, but not much of a clue about what it means.
For many years, the most assiduous provider of data about the ongoing revolution has been Mary Meeker, an industry analyst who once worked for Morgan Stanley, the investment bank that acted as lead underwriter for the Netscape initial public offering in August 1995 (and thereby triggered the first Internet boom). She began making an annual conference presentation, “The Internet Report,” which acquired legendary status in the industry because it distilled from the froth some elements of reality.
Meeker is now a partner at Kleiner Perkins Caulfield & Byers, one of Silicon Valley’s leading venture capital firms, but she has not abandoned her old habits. Last week, she presented her latest annual report — now labeled “Internet Trends” — at the Wall Street Journal’s “All Things Digital” conference in California.
It is a whopping 112-slide presentation, which bears serious contemplation. Buried within it are some startling numbers. For example, Meeker estimates that there are now 2.3 billion Internet users worldwide, which is nearly a third of the world’s population and that number is growing at 8 percent a year. However, what is more startling is there are now 1.1 billion 3G mobile subscribers and that they are increasing at 37 percent per year.
What is significant about that?
Two things. First it means that already a significant proportion of the world’s population is accessing the Internet via a mobile phone rather than via a fixed-line connection. Second, smartphones currently account for less than a fifth of all the mobile phones in the world — which means that the market for Internet-enabled phones has a lot of room for further growth. So stand by for a continued increase in the number of smartphones used across the world.
If you are a mobile network provider, this is probably great news — more and more customers to fleece with expensive data plans. If you are Facebook, then it is less good news because mobile advertising is much less profitable than standard online advertising.
Slide 19 of Meeker’s deck estimates that the eCPM (short for “effective cost per mille,” or the cost per thousand impressions) for mobile ads is five times less than the desktop equivalent. This explains some of the reservations buried in Facebook’s pre-initial public offering filings to the US Securities and Exchange Commission. It may also explain why Facebook is allegedly determined to launch its own smartphone — it is best to control the hardware if you are having difficulty squeezing juice out of ads placed by others.
If, however, you are concerned about things such as freedom, control and innovation, then the prospect of a world in which most people access the Internet via smartphones and other cloud devices is a troubling one.
Why? Because smartphones (and tablets) are tightly controlled, “tethered” appliances. You may think that you own your shiny new iPhone or iPad, for example, but in fact an invisible chain stretches from it all the way back to Apple’s corporate headquarters in California. Nothing, but nothing, goes on your iDevice that has not been approved by Apple.
Even if you are not an Apple fan and sport an Android-powered mobile device, there is still the problem that your access to the Internet is regulated by a company — your mobile network provider — which is free not just to charge prohibitively for access, but also to decide what you can access and what you cannot.
This might not seem a big deal — after all, it is just capitalism doing its thing, but what it means is that with every new smartphone subscription we take another tiny, but discrete step toward a networked world dominated by powerful corporations that cannot only “regulate” the system in their own interests, but also control the speed of technological innovation to a pace that is convenient for them, rather than determined by the creativity of hackers and engineers.
This kind of dystopian outcome has long worried observers such as Harvard academic Jonathan Zittrain, who saw the rise of the tethered appliance as a threat to the creative “generativity” of the Internet.
Up to now, critics have pooh-poohed these fears as unduly fatalistic. The data in Meeker’s latest report, however, tell a different story — they point toward a tethered future in which we are the goats. Except that we will be the first goats in history who loved their tethers.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under