Polluters need education
Your editorial on the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) (“Government idle in face of pollution,” June 4, page 8) really hit the nail on the head.
As mentioned in another opinion piece (“An idle mind is a dirty mind,” Sept. 28, 2011, page 8), the EPA’s recent “enforcement” of anti-idling laws is worthless to the point of being comical.
During the Air Pollution Control Act’s (空氣污染防制法) debut, a supposed 2,000 warnings were given out to owners of idling vehicles. I am curious about both the nature and content of these warnings. Was it a warning that if the perpetrator continued idling, next time they would be slapped with a fine? Or was it a warning that they were simultaneously wasting fuel and, in turn, money, while unnecessarily polluting Taipei’s air? My guess would be the former.
Before attempting to punish ignorant people, there should at least be some attempt at education. In this particular case, the EPA is punishing drivers for something they do not necessarily understand beyond “because the EPA said so.”
Environmental activist groups like Idle-Free Taipei (IFT) are taking the other, more compassionate route: education through information. IFT has a Web site (www.idle-freetaipei.com) dedicated to facts and statistics, myth-busting and proactive solutions to the idling problem in Taipei, and frequently holds events to promote the cause and the belief that the power to make decisions about people’s lives should rest in the hands of the people who are living them.
To raise awareness about air pollution, IFT is hosting a photo contest with a cash prize of NT$5,000 (courtesy of the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Bureau of Energy) to the photographer who captures the most stopped scooters in one frame.
In addition, this weekend, IFT will launch a “sticker stampede,” whereby stickers will be strategically posted throughout Taipei as a friendly daily reminder (or “warning” if you’re the EPA) to motor vehicle operators to go idle-free.
The EPA’s goals and intentions are hidden by a thick veil of black smog that is the Air Pollution Control Act. Intimidation, threats and ultimately punishment in the form of fines will never be a satisfactory replacement for education.
One of the founding principles of William Glasser’s “choice theory” is that “one person cannot ‘make’ another person do anything that he or she chooses not to do. This explains why authoritarian management does not, and will not, result in long-term behavior change.”
And isn’t long-term change the desired goal? Glasser goes on to say that “we need to feel free to make choices and not to feel forced or threatened.”
It’s time for the EPA to stop wasting money and manpower on meaningless, unenforceable policies, and to start funding public service efforts, such as Idle-Free Taipei’s “Courage is Contagious” event, which in one single afternoon educated and converted hundreds of surprised drivers to become non-idlers.
John Fleckenstein
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry