Taiwan’s stock market was tortured throughout last month by the uncertainty over then-minister of finance Christina Liu’s (劉憶如) proposal to introduce a capital gains tax on securities transactions, as well as President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) poor handling of the issue.
During that time, the bourse lost more than NT$2 trillion (US$66.82 billion) in value and in the week preceding Liu’s resignation, the TAIEX suffered the biggest loss of all the Asian stock markets: Trading volume on Monday last week — the day before Liu finally stepped down — was just NT$44.3 billion, its lowest level in 40 months. That evening, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative caucus finally presented its own version of the proposed tax, which turned out to be very different from the version proposed by Liu. Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) praised the KMT caucus for its “diligence” and said it showed the government had arrived at a consensus — as a result Liu was forced to announce her resignation.
Liu’s step-down shows that she has more guts than Ma, because Ma is the one who should really resign. It was Ma, after all, who said that the KMT caucus could discuss Liu’s proposal, but not block it. However, he did not indicate a bottom line for discussions. In the end, the KMT caucus came up with its own version of the tax, which would see individual investors having to pay only if the TAIEX rose above 8,500 points.
In addition, the KMT version included a so-called “dual-track system” — and other complicated conditions — meaning that the capital gains tax would exist in name alone. Nobody can be sure when, if ever, it will be imposed. Even if the tax can be applied at some point, the revenue it would generate is pitiful and would make no significant contribution to relieving the government’s mounting debt.
Ma and Liu presented the stock transaction tax under the banner of “fairness.” The problem is that Ma does not understand economics, still less finance. As to Liu, she is an academic and does not necessarily understand the inner workings of the stock market, especially the influence of big investors’ market manipulations. That is why her tax proposal was simplistic and ill-thought-out. When the proposal ran up against all kinds of obstacles and after public opinion turned against it, Ma stepped back from the brink and let Liu take the flak.
Ma doubles as chairman of the KMT and consequently has control over the party’s legislative caucus. The trio of King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), chief advisor of the KMT’s International Affairs Center, Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) are core members of the Ma team. During the capital gains tax debacle, Lai played a key role, and by not rejecting the KMT caucus proposal, Ma was able to extract himself from a sticky situation.
If Ma wants to prove that he has not been directing this drama from behind the scenes, he will have to follow Liu’s example by resigning. He must accept responsibility for the failure to push through a policy that was supposed to promote fairer wealth distribution — unless, that is, the reforms he is calling for are bogus.
If Ma cannot bring himself to resign as president, then at least he should resign from his post as KMT chairman. That would draw a line between him and the KMT caucus and make it clear that the version of the tax proposal put forward by the KMT caucus has nothing to do with him.
The KMT has plenty of talent available, so it should be able to get on quite well without Ma in charge. Wu and King are both qualified to take on the chairmanship in addition to their present duties, so Ma is not the only possible choice for the job.
Changes to the proposed capital gains tax have given Taiwan’s middle classes a little space to breathe, but less-privileged members of society are under pressure from fuel and electricity price hikes. How are they supposed to get out of their predicament? Wu and Lai and their friends had better keep trying to find a solution.
Furthermore, the plight of Taiwan’s economy is not just about rising prices. Warning lights are flashing, indicating that the economy has been contracting for six consecutive months.
Ma relies on the Chinese economy, but the country’s economic performance is also weakening: A lot of Taiwanese businesspeople who have invested in China are keen to pull out, but cannot.
Council for Economic Planning and Development Minister Yiin Chii-ming (尹啟銘) should be trying to find a way out for Taiwan and for Taiwanese investors in China, but he is more interested in singing Ma’s praises and remaining in his good books. With people like this running the country, when will Taiwan’s economy ever see the light of day?
Still, whatever mistakes Liu might have made, anyone who has served Ma’s interests cannot be wrong entirely, so Ma believes. Considering the contribution she made to Ma’s re-election campaign, it is quite likely that she will be given a post in a state-run company.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under