Transit of Venus matters
On Wednesday at 6am Venus will transit the sun. This may not sound very exciting, but that we know exactly when it will happen should underpin the philosophy of good science teaching.
Traditional books give children the names of the planets and moons and information about them, but they learn nothing of importance. The solar system is a very precise clock that made itself: Your watch counts the precision of the planets’ movements, not the other way around.
Teaching children how the clock works gives them a sense of intrigue and wonder, which makes them search for reason with the discipline of logic — rather than fantasy, which leads to self-interest.
The self-assembly takes place because of what lies inside each atom. That is what is really interesting: If you just have hydrogen atoms milling about in space they will create stars, planets, elements and life by themselves. The idea of entropy starts to look questionable here.
The secret lies in the ratio of gravity to electromagnetism, a fact I have never seen written anywhere, never mind taught in schools. Magnetism is taught as an interesting phenomenon, not something responsible for powers of self-assembly. The ratio, by the way, is 10 to the power of 40. Gravity does the basic assembly and the conservation of angular momentum, along with orbital resonance, produce balance and precision, ie, orbits and timing. Gravity being so small, it takes something as big as the sun before it is strong enough just to put two repelling protons together: This releases energy, which holds up the sun (against gravity) long enough for it to make all the elements up to iron. Smaller bodies like Jupiter do not have enough gravity to push protons together.
Because magnets attract and repel at the same time, matter assembles into everything we see around us without collapsing. If magnets did not repel, the Earth would be the size of a football. Hard for us to believe, but there are places like that out in space.
Next time you look through a clean window and logic tells you there is very little “thing” there, it is really an electromagnetic interaction. When taught like this science starts to show us how different reality is from the illusion created by our senses. A rainbow, for example, exists only inside your head, not in the sky.
My Grade 1 and 2 students learn to compare gravity and magnetism as forces that work together. Newton did not invent the rules, he found them.
We cannot say what gravity and magnetism are, but we can say they need to be like this or the universe would not work. The fact it does work means there are atoms that self-assembled into molecules that can contemplate atoms.
I think that is an awe-inspiring thought and something people would never think of unless they had found it. Thank God it’s not our universe.
Oops! Did I really just write that?
Peter Cook
Greater Taichung
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry