Surgeons have been leaving National Taiwan University (NTU) Hospital for a change of career, moving on to cosmetic surgery, saying that being a surgeon there is too much trouble.
Forty years ago, all outstanding medical students aspired to work at NTU Hospital. What happened? Taiwan’s medical legislation is in need of a thorough review — otherwise, medical care in Taiwan will decline and surgeons will be thin on the ground.
In the US they use the term “medical malpractice” — according to US law this refers to situations in which patients come to be harmed, or the results of their treatment are less than satisfactory, because of carelessness by medical professionals in the course of providing medical care.
In cases like these, the patient has the right to seek compensation in court, but is restricted to seeking civil compensation. Unless it can be shown that the harm caused was intentional or deliberate, medical malpractice does not entail criminal liability.
All providers of medical treatment in the US are required to have medical malpractice insurance. The actual premium not only depends on the type of care you provide, it increases year by year. For some time now the US Medical Association has been asking for amendments to be made to the law to cap payouts for these cases, but lobbyists for the legal profession pull a lot of weight in the US Congress, so no changes have been made. The medical profession has no choice but to pass on the high costs of medical malpractice insurance to the patient. In the US, healthcare expenditure runs at over 16 percent of GDP, partly because of these high premiums.
The premium for a pediatrician is more than US$10,000, and that for an obstetrician or gynecologist about US$80,000 to US$100,000. Neurosurgeons have to fork out something like US$150,000. This is the stuff of nightmares for doctors. If they are successfully sued more than twice, insurance companies will not touch them with a barge pole, and they can kiss their career goodbye.
There are, of course, two sides to this. The medical malpractice system does mean that medical training has to be very stringent, and doctors who should not be practicing are rooted out. As a result, standards of healthcare provision in the US continue to improve.
In the past 40 years I can recall only one case of a doctor in the US being sued in a criminal case — for the assisted suicide of a patient. However, in Taiwan in the past few years, an obstetrician/gynecologist and a neurosurgeon have been found guilty in a criminal court and there was another case of a nurse being found guilty for administering the wrong injection. By US standards, this is unheard of.
It is a matter of urgency that a consensus is reached within the legal and medical professions in Taiwan on the distinction between criminal and civil medical malpractice.
Criminal culpability entails “intentional and serious misconduct,” but there are different interpretations of what exactly this constitutes. The medical and legal professions should concentrate on how “intentional” is to be defined, not on how to distinguish “misconduct” and “serious misconduct.” If needed, they should seek an interpretation by the Council of Grand Justices.
Medical treatment often means the difference between life and death. No doctor is perfect. They need to be given some leeway if we are to have an environment conducive to the provision of good medical treatment. This is something the medical and legal professions need to reflect upon — how to create an environment that is not at the mercy of a culture of litigation.
Max Kuo is a US-based pediatrician.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs