On Friday morning in Brighton Park, a neighborhood in southwest Chicago, about half a dozen Latina volunteers in luminous bibs patrolled the streets around Davis Elementary School. The school sits in the crossfire of three gangs: the Kings, the 2/6s and the SDs (Satan’s Disciples). The trees and walls nearby are peppered with “tags” denoting territory and mourning fallen gang members. There is a shooting in the area every couple of weeks, says Mariela Estrada of the Brighton Park Neighborhood Council, which facilitates the volunteers.
That evening, just a couple of blocks away, a 14-year-old, Alejandro Jaime, was shot dead while out riding his bike with his 11-year-old friend. According to witnesses, a car knocked them both off their bikes. They picked themselves up and ran. A man got out of the car and shot Alejandro in the back.
“Although it’s the city’s job to provide public safety, we had to respond, since our children are in danger,” said Nancy Barraza, a Parent Patrol volunteer.
The next morning, world leaders started arriving in Chicago for the NATO summit where, just 20 minutes from Brighton Park, they would discuss how to maintain international security. The dissonance between the global pretensions of the summit and the local realities of Chicago could not be more striking. NATO claims its purpose is to secure peace through security; in much of Chicago, neither exists.
When Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel brought the summit to Chicago, he boasted: “From a city perspective, this will be an opportunity to showcase what is great about the greatest city in the greatest country.”
The alternative “99 percent tour” of the city, organized by the Grassroots Collective that came to Brighton Park, revealed how utterly those who claim to export peace and prosperity abroad have failed to provide it at home.
The murder rate in Chicago in the first three months of this year increased by more than 50 percent compared with the same period last year, giving it almost twice the murder rate of New York. And the manner in which the city is policed gives many as great a reason to fear those charged with protecting them as the criminals. By the end of July last year, police were shooting people at the rate of six a month and killing one person every two weeks.
This violence, be it at the hands of the state or gangs, is both compounded and underpinned by racial and economic disadvantage. The poorer the neighborhood, the more violent; the wealthier, the safer. This is no coincidence. Much like the NATO summit — and the G8 summit that preceded it — the system is set up not to spread wealth, but to preserve and protect it; not to relieve chaos, but to contain and punish it.
NATO is not an impartial arbiter in this state of affairs, but the military wing of a political and economic project that makes it possible. Neoliberal globalization and the inequities that come with it cannot exist without force or the threat of it.
“The hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist,” said Thomas Friedman, an ardent advocate of free-market globalization. “McDonald’s cannot flourish without McDonnell Douglas, the designer of the F-15. And the hidden fist that keeps the world safe for Silicon Valley’s technologies to flourish is called the US Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps.”
The paradox inherent in a city like Chicago hosting a summit like this not only lays bare the brutal nature in which these inequalities are maintained at a global level, but it lends us an opportunity to understand how those inequalities are replicated locally.
Chicago illustrates how the developing world is everywhere, not least in the heart of the developed. The mortality rate for black infants in the city is on a par with the West Bank; black life expectancy in Illinois is just below Egypt and just above Uzbekistan. More than a quarter of Chicagoans have no health insurance, one in five black male Chicagoans are unemployed and one in three live in poverty. Latinos do not fare much better. Chicago may be extreme in this regard, but it is by no means unique. While the ethnic composition of poverty might change depending on the country, its dynamics will doubtless be familiar to G8 and NATO delegates.
The gated communities — like the one in which Trayvon Martin was killed — have been erected on a global scale to protect those fleeing the mayhem wrought by our economic and military policies.
This was exemplified in March last year, when a boat with 72 African refugees fled the NATO-led war in Libya.
When the boat found itself stranded, it sent out a distress signal that was passed on to NATO, which had “declared the region a military zone under its control,” and then promptly ignored it, as did an Italian ship.
The boat bobbed around in the Mediterranean for two weeks. All but nine on board were left to die from starvation, thirst or in storms, including two babies.
“We can talk as much as we want about the importance of complying with international obligations,” said Tineke Strik, the special rapporteur investigating the case. “But if at the same time we just leave people to die, it exposes how meaningless those words are.”
When Alejandro Jaime’s parents hear Emanuel talk about “showcasing the greatest city in the greatest country,” they doubtless receive his words with similar disdain.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry