There is a ritual in European politics that is stretching the patience of its citizens.
International lenders push for a debt problem to be resolved. They are ignored. They withdraw loan facilities to the country they are worried about to provoke some action. Seconds before the country in question runs out of cash, Brussels — reluctantly backed by Berlin — runs to the rescue, ditching its hard line and emptying its purse in the process.
Like a mother and father accused of inconsistent parenting, Brussels is flip-flopping in its treatment of countries that behave like children issuing one blackmail demand after another. Every time the German half of the relationship makes a speech about tough love, another adult in the family offers a helping hand.
In December last year, a kindly uncle in the form of European Central Bank President Mario Draghi stepped in. He reversed the policies of his predecessor by issuing hundreds of millions of euros to eurozone banks, which invested in indebted states such as Spain, Italy and Portugal. It was nothing less than a back-door handout.
It is a farce that appears to have no end. Only consistency can win the day, which means showing more love now with some agreed rules to follow. Debts need to be cut for those countries we know have accumulated them to unsustainable levels. This move would benefit the naughtiest children, but that is necessary, and we have done it before and been rewarded with better behavior.
Let us go back to the aftermath of World War II and the way British endured bread rationing to support starving Germans. If ever there was a naughty child, it had been Germany. The Allies handed over billions of dollars in cash and wrote off loans. The rules governing how Germany should get back on its feet were very basic, allowing Bonn to build a protectionist economy that dismayed Britain and the US, which promoted free trade.
In the present crisis, German Minister of Finance Wolfgang Schaeuble says if the Greeks do not like the rules they can leave the family. Not only is it unfair, it would not work. The cost of making life so miserable for the Greeks that they leave is too high for the family.
Which is why Brussels will, at the 11th hour, always back down.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under