Several days ago, during a government meeting on finance and economics, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said his administration intended to speed up the implementation of its “golden decade” plan through a series of liberalization measures and incentives. He emphasized that the service sector and particularly tourism, were the key to improving income distribution and creating more jobs. He also said he wanted to see 10 million tourists visiting the nation annually by the end of his second term.
Purely in terms of tourist destinations, Taiwan is in a far better position than Hong Kong or Singapore, yet it attracts far fewer travellers. For example, last year just over 6 million foreigners came to Taiwan and 30 percent were Chinese. By comparison, Singapore had 13 million and Hong Kong 40 million.
Is Ma’s goal of boosting tourist traffic to 10 million annually realistic, or is it just more pie-in-the-sky thinking?
Over the past two decades, 17 international carriers, including British Airways, Air France, Lufthansa, Swissair, Quantas and American Airlines have stopped operating routes to Taiwan.
This has had a significant negative impact on the number of overseas tourists and the amount of freight coming to, or passing through, the country. It has also frustrated the government’s efforts to raise the nation’s international profile.
Why did these airlines pull out of Taiwan? And has the government looked into the matter or put measures in place to address the situation?
It has been overly protective of domestic carriers, allowing them to undercut the competition and this has forced foreign airlines out of the market. Some US carriers, such as United Airlines and Northwest Airlines do still fly to Taipei, but they no longer operate direct routes: passengers bound for the US have to transfer in Tokyo’s Narita International Airport or in other cities in the region.
In the near future, international airports in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou are set to become more deregulated and grow into major centers for passenger and freight transport. That is good for them, but bad news for Taiwan, which will become even more marginalized as a result of the reduction in the number of direct flights to the nation.
In April 2006, China Airlines introduced a route between Taipei and Abu Dhabi, the only direct flight between Taiwan and the Middle East. The United Arab Emirates government welcomed this move and offered several incentives, including discounted refueling and exemptions from certain fees such as for landing and parking at Abu Dhabi International Airport. The route proved very popular for several years and tickets were often difficult to come by because many Southeast Asian passengers flew the route and transferred in Abu Dhabi to proceed to other Middle Eastern destinations.
In 2009, however, China Airlines decided to discontinue the route, claiming it was not profitable. I myself flew this route on many occasions and was there for the maiden flight. I find it immensely regrettable that China Airlines did not try harder to expand its Middle Eastern passenger base or develop tourism there.
How does the government intend to expand the tourist industry? Ma wants to see more deregulation and incentives, but it is debatable whether this rather vague directive will be enough on its own.
In addition, if the increase in annual tourist traffic from overseas to 10 million over the next four years comes mainly from Chinese tourists, one wonders how this is supposed to help the nation raise its international profile.
There is much that needs to be done, but before anything else happens the government must deregulate the skies and amend its policy on aviation rights, to encourage international tourist and freight traffic.
Taiwan has already signed Open Skies Agreements (OSA) with the US and Japan, but the nation needs to expand cooperation with EU countries.
If we had an OSA with an EU country — Luxembourg, for example — Taiwanese carriers would be able to stop over in any EU country. Such agreements would also enable other Taiwanese airlines such as TransAsia Airways and Far Eastern Air Transport to fly to Europe.
Of course, China Airlines or EVA could balk at the idea of the increased competition, but it would be in the nation’s long-term interest and would help to raise Taiwan’s international profile. Neither the Ministry of Transportation and Communications nor the Civil Aeronautics Administration must allow themselves to be hijacked by vested interests.
If Taiwan wants to become a hub for the Asia-Pacific region, the Ma administration needs to rethink its approach. Opening up to more EU and other international airlines would help to improve international visibility, but when EU countries raise the issue of signing an OSA, the government seems to prefer to stay in its comfort zone in the interest of protecting domestic carriers.
Parris Chang is a former National Security Council deputy secretary-general and chair professor of general education at Toko University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.