Several days ago, during a government meeting on finance and economics, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said his administration intended to speed up the implementation of its “golden decade” plan through a series of liberalization measures and incentives. He emphasized that the service sector and particularly tourism, were the key to improving income distribution and creating more jobs. He also said he wanted to see 10 million tourists visiting the nation annually by the end of his second term.
Purely in terms of tourist destinations, Taiwan is in a far better position than Hong Kong or Singapore, yet it attracts far fewer travellers. For example, last year just over 6 million foreigners came to Taiwan and 30 percent were Chinese. By comparison, Singapore had 13 million and Hong Kong 40 million.
Is Ma’s goal of boosting tourist traffic to 10 million annually realistic, or is it just more pie-in-the-sky thinking?
Over the past two decades, 17 international carriers, including British Airways, Air France, Lufthansa, Swissair, Quantas and American Airlines have stopped operating routes to Taiwan.
This has had a significant negative impact on the number of overseas tourists and the amount of freight coming to, or passing through, the country. It has also frustrated the government’s efforts to raise the nation’s international profile.
Why did these airlines pull out of Taiwan? And has the government looked into the matter or put measures in place to address the situation?
It has been overly protective of domestic carriers, allowing them to undercut the competition and this has forced foreign airlines out of the market. Some US carriers, such as United Airlines and Northwest Airlines do still fly to Taipei, but they no longer operate direct routes: passengers bound for the US have to transfer in Tokyo’s Narita International Airport or in other cities in the region.
In the near future, international airports in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou are set to become more deregulated and grow into major centers for passenger and freight transport. That is good for them, but bad news for Taiwan, which will become even more marginalized as a result of the reduction in the number of direct flights to the nation.
In April 2006, China Airlines introduced a route between Taipei and Abu Dhabi, the only direct flight between Taiwan and the Middle East. The United Arab Emirates government welcomed this move and offered several incentives, including discounted refueling and exemptions from certain fees such as for landing and parking at Abu Dhabi International Airport. The route proved very popular for several years and tickets were often difficult to come by because many Southeast Asian passengers flew the route and transferred in Abu Dhabi to proceed to other Middle Eastern destinations.
In 2009, however, China Airlines decided to discontinue the route, claiming it was not profitable. I myself flew this route on many occasions and was there for the maiden flight. I find it immensely regrettable that China Airlines did not try harder to expand its Middle Eastern passenger base or develop tourism there.
How does the government intend to expand the tourist industry? Ma wants to see more deregulation and incentives, but it is debatable whether this rather vague directive will be enough on its own.
In addition, if the increase in annual tourist traffic from overseas to 10 million over the next four years comes mainly from Chinese tourists, one wonders how this is supposed to help the nation raise its international profile.
There is much that needs to be done, but before anything else happens the government must deregulate the skies and amend its policy on aviation rights, to encourage international tourist and freight traffic.
Taiwan has already signed Open Skies Agreements (OSA) with the US and Japan, but the nation needs to expand cooperation with EU countries.
If we had an OSA with an EU country — Luxembourg, for example — Taiwanese carriers would be able to stop over in any EU country. Such agreements would also enable other Taiwanese airlines such as TransAsia Airways and Far Eastern Air Transport to fly to Europe.
Of course, China Airlines or EVA could balk at the idea of the increased competition, but it would be in the nation’s long-term interest and would help to raise Taiwan’s international profile. Neither the Ministry of Transportation and Communications nor the Civil Aeronautics Administration must allow themselves to be hijacked by vested interests.
If Taiwan wants to become a hub for the Asia-Pacific region, the Ma administration needs to rethink its approach. Opening up to more EU and other international airlines would help to improve international visibility, but when EU countries raise the issue of signing an OSA, the government seems to prefer to stay in its comfort zone in the interest of protecting domestic carriers.
Parris Chang is a former National Security Council deputy secretary-general and chair professor of general education at Toko University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations