Another white-collar criminal (in this case sometimes white-collar) has disappeared after the verdict was handed down in his final trial and he had to report to the authorities to start serving a prison term.
Much as Thai newspapers have been filled for decades with stories about drivers involved in traffic accidents escaping by swimming a nearby canal, Taiwan’s judicial history over the past two decades is littered with prominent businesspeople or politicians who are nowhere to be found when it comes time to do their time. Many of them eventually resurface in China, the US or elsewhere, such as former Tuntex Group president Chen Yu-hao (陳由豪), former Kuangsan Enterprise Group president Tseng Cheng-jen (曾正仁), former Kaohsiung City Council speaker Chu An-hsiung (朱安雄), former Kaohsiung mayor and tycoon Wang Yu-yun (王玉雲), former Chung Hsing Bank vice chairman Wang Chih-hsiung (王志雄) and former legislator Ho Chih-hui (何智輝) — the list grows longer every year.
Now, former independent legislator Lo Fu-chu (羅福助) has presumably joined their ranks — “presumably” because no authority in Taiwan appears to know his whereabouts, except that he has not been seen in weeks. It is hard to believe that someone who relished publicity for so long — as demonstrated when he slapped and punched fellow lawmaker Diane Lee (李慶安) during a committee hearing after she reportedly accused him of being a gangster — is now willing to lay low.
Lo was placed on the wanted list on Wednesday after failing to report to prosecutors on Tuesday to begin serving a four-year term. The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office said it received a petition from Lo on Tuesday asking for a reprieve so that he could file an extraordinary appeal, but prosecutors rejected it and issued 22 warrants for his arrest. His NT$10 million (US$339,000) bond was also confiscated and the prosecutors’ office said the statute of limitations on his case would not expire until December 2030.
The Ministry of Justice was quick to deflect any blame for the non-appearance of yet another high-profile convict by blaming the law. The ministry said the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法) prevents law enforcement from monitoring convicts’ telephone lines in the run-up to their reporting date, and prosecutors can only issue warrants if the convict fails to report for prison. The ministry said it would propose an amendment to allow prosecutors to issue warrants for major criminals as soon as the courts hand down final verdicts in their cases. It also wants prosecutors to be able to monitor convicts through electronic tags and other means as they await their final verdict.
Minister of the Interior Lee Hong-yuan (李鴻源) also blamed the laxity in the law regarding the period between when a final sentence is given and when the convicted must report to start their sentence. Lee said his officials would discuss the matter with their justice ministry counterparts, but added that in addition to the practical difficulties of monitoring all would-be inmates, the human rights of an inmate-to-be must also be respected.
Respect is all well and good, but it is the judicial system that needs to claw back some of that respect — and it needs the legislature’s help. If the law is too weak, it needs to be changed, immediately.
There are several ways to avoid this growing problem of no-shows among wealthy, connected convicts or even run-of-the-mill criminals: Cut down on paperwork by requiring immediate remand into custody upon conviction, instead of issuing summonses or warrants; institute greater use of electronic monitoring anklets or bracelets for those out on bond and awaiting a final verdict; and, in cases where there is a possible jail term of several years, travel bans and surrendering of passports should be an automatic requirement in the final trial phase.
It is time to stop counting the growing number of vanishing defendants and take action to prevent them from fleeing justice.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under