The government is about to conditionally allow the import of US beef containing the leanness-enhancing additive ractopamine. However, following the failure of the “three controls and five checkpoints,” most people are questioning the government’s pledge and ability to guarantee food safety. The “three controls” are constraints imposed on beef imports at the source, at borders and in markets, while the “five checkpoints” are certification, checking that shipments are marked with detailed product information, opening a high percentage of cartons of beef to check the product, conducting food safety tests and getting information on suspected problem products immediately.
Trade liberalization has increased product circulation, making the question of how to guarantee food safety a global issue. There are already successful examples of food safety controls outside of Taiwan, and even though these controls may require local adaptation because of differing national and industrial situations, as well as consumer habits, these examples are worth following. There is no reason for us to work in splendid isolation.
Many food safety controls are common to developed countries. First, these countries have established a set of laws and regulations. The EU, for example, created 211 food safety laws, regulations and standards, which gradually came to form a system for legal supervision of food safety centered around the European Commission’s White Paper on Food Safety. This system offered a legal framework for government administration and a way to avoid legal disputes. It also clearly delineated the responsibility of producers and sellers, demanding that they guarantee product quality and safety or face legal liability.
One concrete example of such regulations is that when sellers discover that a food product does not meet safety standards, they must inform the governing authority in a timely manner and cooperate with the authority in implementing appropriate response measures. If the product has already reached consumers and can no longer be controlled, they must promptly inform the public and initiate a recall.
Second, such countries have integrated a division of labor system. Japan established its Food Safety Commission to take charge of food safety coordination and management, as well as risk assessments. The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare and the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries are in charge of risk management, share responsibility for food safety and guarantee the transparency of the decisionmaking process. The main supervisory EU food safety authorities are the legislative organs — the European Commission, the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament — who are in charge of creating laws, regulations, legal texts and policy; consultative organs such as the European Food Safety Authority — which provide risk assessments and consultative services regarding food safety problems; and executive organs — the Directorate-General for Health and Consumers with six subordinate institutions — which are responsible for practical controls and creating an effective control mechanism.
Third, they have built a safety network that reaches “from the farm to the dinner table.” At the production stage, at the farm, the EU controls the health of animals and plants through a system of hazard analysis and critical control points. During the distribution stage, in the marketplace, it relies on a rapid alert system, so that when a member state discovers a possible threat to human health in food or animal feed, it can immediately report it to the European Commission to determine the risk level before informing other member states. The individual member states will then adopt the necessary countermeasures with the help of the European Food Safety Authority. On the dinner table, at the consumer stage, the EU relies on a food labeling system divided into a horizontal and a vertical system. The first regulates the contents of safety labels used for all foods, and the latter regulates food hygiene and identification.
Japan, in addition to adopting strict controls through a stratified inspection model — which relies on monitored, ordered and independent inspections — implements a domestic traceability system that takes a specified approach for each product. For example, the traceability system for important industries, such as the beef and the rice industry, is an enforced system, whereas a voluntary system is employed for other products.
Given concerns over personnel costs, non-governmental organizations participate in the practical implementation of the system to make up for government insufficiencies. Japan uses a system set up by the Central Union of Agricultural Co-operatives that includes information management — using information technology to record production, processing and distribution data, inspections and certification — and carrying out internal and external inspections, after which the Central Union of Agricultural Co-operatives issues certificates for products passing the inspections. The system also includes information transparency, which provides producers and consumers with timely production, distribution and food safety information through the Internet and retailers. In this way, Japan has managed to unite its government, producers, wholesalers and consumers in shared responsibility for maintaining food safety.
It is the government’s responsibility to see that people do not have to be afraid of what they eat, and public trust is the cornerstone of a government’s existence. If the government wants to regain public trust, it should start with food safety.
Lee Wu-chung is a professor of agricultural economics.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry