ICRT should be put down
When an animal is suffering and in pain in the middle of a crowded venue, what should be done? I propose the public would support that its suffering be ended as quickly as possible. Now, what if the animal in question has been owned for decades by a prominent Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) business family? Would it count as an insult if the public acted?
Following this principle, is it not time that Taiwanese asked the National Communications Commission to revoke International Community Radio Taipei’s (ICRT) broadcast license, even though the revocation might cause the Koo family to lose face? ICRT has been under the control of the Koo family since its establishment by the American Chamber of Commerce in 1979. For the first decade of its existence ICRT did a wonderful job of introducing the world to Taiwan via English-only programs. Thousands of Taiwanese students listened every day because ICRT was a free source of information in English.
ICRT’s collapse in recent years is partly due to its management’s insistence that it is a music station instead of fulfilling its original mandate from the government to act as a bridge between the Western and Chinese communities. The Internet has made much of ICRT’s mandate redundant — however, ICRT’s management’s decision to reduce its news coverage at night, employ Taiwanese announcers, be bilingual and broadcast music genres out of touch with Taiwanese society has resulted in its decline. ICRT no longer promotes English in Taiwan, rather it is now Taiwan’s source of “silly English” and low-class American culture.
A half-dozen years ago the Koo family attempted to turn ICRT into a Mandarin-only radio station. The public showed their dissatisfaction with the change by sending a petition to the Government Information Office (GIO). That petition was organized by Anthony Van Dyck and was supported by Taipei Times reporters and independent journalists like Dave Frazier.
Is it possible for Van Dyck with help from the Taipei Times to again push the government to direct ICRT’s management to fulfill its mandate or give up its broadcasting license? The April 9 earthquake shows Taiwan requires an all-English news source while the decline of English among Taiwanese students shows there is a need for an all-English, all native speaker radio station. Van Dyck, are you up to the challenge of once again alerting the government that ICRT no longer fulfills its mandate, is suffering and in need of a quick and painless death?
Chou Long
New Taipei City
Temple turtle trauma
My wife and I just returned to Australia from a three-week holiday in Taiwan. We enjoyed it very much and liked the country and its people.
However, on our stay on Penghu Island we visited the Da-yi Temple on Hsiyu Island (西嶼) and found fully grown live green turtles kept in the small, pitiful underground pond inside the temple.
We were very distressed and horrified to see these wonderful animals kept in such conditions for the sake of tourists.
On one side Taiwan prides itself as trying to preserve green turtles through the “Green Turtle Conservation Center” on Wangan (望安); on the other side you torture living turtles in a cave.
Our guide pointed out a sign at the entrance to the underground pond saying: “The keeping of the turtles has been approved by the Ministry of Wildlife.” The sign looked handwritten and not very official; no stamp or address. Just a guilty warning to forestall complaints?
If this is the case, the ministry only pays lip service to the wildlife rules or some pressure has been put on them to allow the torture of these turtles.
How can the elders of this temple, who preach harmony, respect for life and goodwill justify this?
We are not bleeding-heart “greenies” and realize that people will kill animals for food, etc. However, this blatant cruelty is disgusting.
I look forward to a reply from the temple elders and will take further steps to publicize the plight of these turtles.
Manfred Subke
Australia
Pumped-up prices
I would like to express my opinion on the news about the fuel price hike (“Fuel price increases reflect rising global costs: KMT,” April 5, page 2).
After I read this article, I felt so frustrated with the government. The fuel price should be raised fairly. I mean, if this week the fuel price has to be raised, then it should be, and the fuel price should not be controlled by anyone who is not related to it (President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), for example).
I think President Ma is selfish because he manipulated the oil price to win the Jan. 14 presidential election. Last week the oil price rose by NT$3 per liter, and this has affected many people, including the bus companies, taxis and the public. I think the government should keep an eye on CPC’s costs because it is a state-run business. The government should lower CPC’s costs to ease citizens’ burdens so gasoline prices will fall.
Finally, I think the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has done a great job of watching what the government does. The DPP should keep this up and find mistakes made by the government so we can have an efficient government.
Jonathan Lin Chang-chun
Chiayi City
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry