The female of the species is more deadly than the male, cautioned Rudyard Kipling. Given Kipling’s love of mythology and prehistoric studies, he should perhaps have added: and smarter.
Because of all deities of wisdom across the globe and through known time, the massive majority — 97 percent — were (or are) female. Mankind, for the vast span of human experience, has worshipped at the shrine not of the god, but the goddess of wisdom.
Flesh-and-blood women, it seems, have managed to draw strength from this fact. Women were often accepted as the prime educators in their communities, but individuals also exploited the currency of sacred wisdom with surprising results. Religion is an easy target for accusations of repression and misogyny, but achievement in the sacred and therefore socio-political sphere was often an option for women, thanks not to brawn, but to brain.
Take Theodora, the empress of Byzantium — the world’s first monotheist empire — who capitalized on the wisdom she was rightfully allowed to wield. Wisdom had already been memorialized in sensuous, female form in the Old Testament in the Book of Proverbs and the Song of Songs. Theodora, who started life in the gutter as an erotic dancer, would end up ruling with “wisdom’s lilies” woven through her crown.
Soon after her coronation, Theodora incarnated the biblical understanding of wisdom as the ability to make sound judgements and she legislated furiously — introducing safehouses for prostitutes, outlawing pimps and introducing new penalties for rape. The Justinian code — the system of law she developed with Justinian, her husband and co-ruler — underpins much of European law.
Islam too recognized the key role women should play in implementing God’s instruction “to seek knowledge.”
Hadiths — sayings attributed to the Prophet Mohammed — recommended this as an activity for both women and men. Not only did Muslim women frequently found schools, but also one of the first recorded universities in the world — the Qarawiyyin University in Fez — was built in the ninth century by a Muslim Tunisian woman, Fatima al-Fihri.
For the past 25 years Muhammad Akram Nadwi, from the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies, has been researching the role of female Muslim academics. His tally of names reaches 8,500 to date. Particularly in the very early years of Islam, and again in the 12th century as a reaction to the threat of the crusades, women preached in the great mosques of Damascus, Medina, Cairo and Jerusalem.
The story was the same the further you traveled east. We eagerly discuss the educating vigor of the “Tiger mother” today. Wait until you meet the premiere Asian matriarch — Wu Zetian (武則天), who in the seventh century used the power of words and belief to win out.
By rights Wu should be a household name, her achievements were so remarkable, but within decades of her death her memory had been slandered and physically eradicated, and her memorial stone at Qianling in China’s Shanxi Province has been left blank.
Consider what Wu achieved. She invaded Korea and Tibet; reformed the administrative system of the Chinese empire; provided Buddhism with a warm embrace when its influence was waning across the Indian subcontinent; and, vitally, she was a patron of printing 700 years before it arrived in Europe.
Determined to promote Buddhist ideas (and word of her power) throughout her vast territories, which reached from outer Mongolia to the Pacific ocean, she ordered the mass production of 84,000 Buddhist texts. She was also the first imperial ruler to see the potential of printing technology in successful, sacrally tinged statecraft. For centuries Wu has been commemorated only by remote communities of Buddhist monks. To this day, at dawn prayers at Famen-Si monastery, they still chant the poetry she composed.
Men came to resent the liberty that learning afforded women like Wu and chose not to record these case studies in official histories. Religious institutions, with the patterning of those early goddesses of wisdom still in their DNA, were more confident about allowing women to be wise.
In the seventh century, the monk Adhelm praised nuns under the care of the abbess of Barking (near London) who “gathered knowledge from law, histories and scripture as bees gather honey.”
Again and again we find similar examples, up until the 12th century.
This golden age for women’s sacred wisdom was, though, short-lived. Once universities, rather than religious orders, were established as the key repositories of learning, women would find it ever harder to prove the pen as mighty as the sword. They were excluded from the university system — in Cambridge. England, they only gained degrees on an equal footing with men in 1948.
Buttressed by an acceptance of female wisdom in the sacred sphere from the beginnings of organized religion 12,000 years ago to late antiquity and beyond, key women used wit and the power of the word to change the world around them.
No little irony that these same women do not now enjoy the name recognition that they deserve, because they have been systematically written out of history.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations