The recent increases in the cost of fuel, water and electricity, and the rise in commodity prices, has been the subject of much debate.
Some blame the price rises on pre-election machinations, claiming they are the result of a freeze on prices prior to the election. Others blame international factors, saying that tensions between Iran and Israel are pushing up crude oil prices.
Certain industrialists have welcomed the rises, suggesting that the public has been spoiled by artificially low water and electricity prices.
Actually, the causes of the price rises are not really important. What matters are their social implications, in the sense that higher prices reinforce economic divisions.
Escalating real-estate and commodity prices are a barrier to social mobility, while members of the middle class who have managed to get their feet on the lower rungs of the property ladder become slaves to their mortgage payments.
In addition, the younger generation faces the prospect of joining the ranks of the “working poor,” a common situation in European cities during economic downturns.
The Taiwanese spirit of reaping the rewards of hard work is already a thing of the past. What we now have is a class-based society in which a whole strata of people have no future to look forward to. In addition, tuition fees are set to rise, even though higher education does not necessarily guarantee getting ahead.
Even those who own property in Taipei face the threat of seeing it expropriated in the name of urban renewal or transferred to banks in exchange for retirement pensions.
From housing and commodity prices to tuition fees and urban renewal, issues that were previously considered neutral are fast becoming mechanisms for the redistribution of wealth.
Take for example the Wang (王) family evicted from their home as part of the Wenlin Yuan (文林苑) urban renewal project in Taipei.
Although the Wangs’ case is an extreme example, the point is that we are allowing ourselves to sleepwalk into something potentially far more serious.
On top of this exclusionary and divided economy sits an equally exclusionary political system.
Prior to the presidential election, several Taiwanese corporate bosses came out in support of the so-called “1992 consensus” because they stood to benefit from it. However, after the election, the consensus was quickly dropped in favor of the “one country, two areas (一國兩區)” concept.
It is getting difficult to distinguish between Taiwan and Hong Kong, as Beijing and real-estate conglomerates conspire to decide who should be the area’s chief executive. Today, the very diversity and tolerance that is the pride of Taiwanese democracy is fading away.
An exclusive class-based society does not sit well with an inclusive democracy. The former does not allow for social consensus in national policy formation. Since the election, we have endured the US beef issue, the “one country, two areas” concept and price rises triggered by state-owned enterprises, all of which were products of closed-door decisionmaking.
As a result, social and political tensions and confrontation are on the rise. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) remains largely untouched by this, but many Taiwanese are struggling to ensure their children do not face a future of downward social mobility.
When Ma gives his inaugural speech on May 20, he will be speaking of a Taiwan under the thrall of an increasingly exclusionary political and economic system.
Hsu Yung-ming is an associate professor in Soochow University’s Department of Political Science.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.