The newly elected Aung San Suu Kyi now faces a huge weight of expectations, but analysts say the inspirational dissident might have to temper her grand political goals and deal with bread-and-butter issues.
After decades in the political wilderness, the Nobel laureate finds herself in the position of being co-opted to legitimize the reform agenda and political system of the new military-backed government.
The veteran activist will have to sit down with her former foes to find ways to help farmers, promote investment and develop a country struggling to emerge from five decades of economic mismanagement under the military.
“Whether a minister in charge of a portfolio or a frustrated backbencher, her room for political maneuvering is smaller than as an unattached opponent,” Hong Kong University assistant professor Renaud Egreteau said.
Even if Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy (NLD) party wins all 44 seats it contested, it cannot challenge the huge legislative majority enjoyed by the military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP).
In addition, a quarter of the seats in parliament are reserved for unelected military officials, but for the first time after Sunday’s by-elections, the NLD leader will have a voice in the legislature, where lawmakers have for the past year been debating topics ranging from the national budget to healthcare and Chinese energy projects.
A Myanmar expert said Aung San Suu Kyi will have to be pragmatic and buckle down to tackling everyday issues, rather than the grander themes of democracy and constitutional change she championed in her campaign speeches.
“The current USDP parliament is quite energetic. They have done an amazing job in the past year, but their agenda is day-to-day, much more bread-and-butter issues that are the concern of the general population,” said Aung Naing Oo, an analyst at the Vahu Development Institute, a think tank in Thailand. “Aung San Suu Kyi has to talk rhetoric during the election campaign, but what she has said are not quite the day-to-day issues. The most important issue in our country is the economy and Aung San Suu Kyi doesn’t have economic credentials.”
One big question remains: Whether Aung San Suu Kyi could take on some kind of government role.
In January, presidential adviser Nay Zin Latt said there was “a possibility she will be appointed to the government.”
However, no other officials have since raised that possibility and Aung San Suu Kyi on Friday last week said she had no plans to accept a position as minister if it was offered, because by law she would have to give up her seat in parliament.
However, she did indicate that she might be willing to take on some kind of other role, possibly to help resolve the country’s ethnic conflicts.
Whatever she chooses, it is a long way from 2002-2003 when Aung San Suu Kyi, in between periods of house arrest, favored a more confrontational approach toward the junta, notably defying orders not to travel around the country.
Aung Naing Oo said Aung San Suu Kyi would bring prestige and influence to whichever role she chose, but her unyielding character could be an issue.
“She also brings her personality and her determination to the table. It would be like a double-edged sword for some of the people. She also can be problematic, so the key issue here is how well she can push her way in these uncharted waters, either in parliament or in government,” he said.
Some have in the past criticized Aung San Suu Kyi for what they saw as an intransigent approach to the junta, saying it resulted in a deadlock between the two sides, but Senior General Than Shwe, the junta chief who regarded her as his personal enemy, stepped down a year ago and the new generation of leaders is better disposed toward her.
Experts say the 66-year-old opposition leader must now look beyond her own legacy.
“No democracy can really build around one person,” said Thitinan Pongsudhirak, a political scientist at Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University. “Now there has to be a shift to broaden the focus, not just to be on her, but her supporters, her new lieutenants, her party and other democratic institutions in Myanmar, including the ruling party, the incumbent regime.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry