Former legislator, writer and TV personality Li Ao (李敖) is right about Taiwan — according to the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution, it is part of China. That is precisely why the Constitution should be rewritten, to reflect the reality that Taiwan is an independent country in all but name and is separate from the country that really controls the bulk of China, the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
Although Li considers himself to be Chinese and supports unification, his views about the ROC Constitution are not all that different from those of staunch Taiwan independence advocates. Both recognize that the current Constitution is a Chinese constitution and that the ROC as defined by the Constitution is China, not Taiwan.
For Taiwan to be independent, it must have a constitution that claims only the territory that the sovereign government of Taiwan actually holds, namely, Taiwan and a few small islands.
Until that is done, Taiwan and China may be separate in reality, but according to the law, they are parts of the same country.
Li often makes another point, that it is bogus to say that 23 million Taiwanese have the right to decide their own future. He makes this assertion based on the legality of the ROC Constitution, which claims sovereignty over the PRC. Because Taiwan is a democracy, don’t those 1.3 billion people also get to vote about Taiwan’s future? That would be constitutional, according to Li’s view.
And again, Li is right. The ROC Constitution lays claim to the area governed by the PRC, even Mongolia, and Taiwan is a democratic country, so how can the desires of the people in these places be represented?
The simple answer is that they cannot. The very idea is absurd, even if it is constitutional. This is another reason to revise the Constitution.
The US had a similar constitutional problem when it was made up of 13 independent colonies that joined together to gain independence from Britain. The first order of business in that fight for independence was the Declaration of Independence, later followed by a constitution that asserted legal separation from Britain.
Before either of those documents were written, the colonies already exercised a sort of de facto independence for years because of their distance from London. However, to gain real independence, they had to have a US constitution laying out in detail their territorial claims.
If Taiwan is ever to be independent, it has to have a constitution that declares its separation from China, not just the ROC or the PRC. It also has to drop its claims to all areas in China.
Of course, any such move would result in war with China, another point that Li loves to make. The US had to fight a brutal eight year war with Britain to gain independence and they had an ocean between them in an age long before airplanes, missiles and cyberwarriors.
However, although Li has many good points to make, one thing he, and others, are unable to gauge is the willingness of Taiwanese to stand up for their nation. Only time will tell in that regard.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s