A five-year, NT$50 billion (US$1.7 billion) program aimed at improving the international ranking of Taiwanese universities has entered its second stage. Even so, this year, all Taiwanese universities slipped in the annual ranking of international universities published by the UK newspaper the Times. One university slipped from 107th place last year to the cluster of universities ranked from Nos. 201 to 225 this year, while another slid from 115th place to 154th place.
However, is this kind of ranking really meaningful? It seems impossible that a university could experience such great fluctuation in just one year. Even if every professor spent a year at the beach, it is unlikely that the ranking would drop by as much as 100 places. And if one school drops, others will rise, so if one slips radically, it would only be natural to think that other schools could see equally dramatic improvements in their ranking.
This latest ranking must be a blow to the government. It has invested heavily in universities to improve rankings, only to see them drop. Anyone who did not receive financial assistance will surely think the program a big waste of money.
It is entirely unnecessary to pay any attention to these rankings. Instead, the focus should be on how Taiwan’s universities operate. We should set up our own requirements and we should help universities that show research potential to move up to the next level. At the same time, we must not forget that education is an important task for any university. If our universities use realistic and effective teaching methods, we should take pride in them, regardless of whether or not international universities take notice.
For example, the schools that receive a lot of bright students should strengthen their training in basic subjects. Students in science and engineering schools could focus on physics, chemistry and mathematics. Not only would this make them competent scientists or engineers, it would make them highly innovative as well. Other schools should focus on building students’ world view and training them in the humanities. That would substantively elevate the competitiveness of Taiwan as a whole.
University students’ knowledge should come from more than just text books. In particular, the education of students in technological institutes must be connected to the industrial sector and students should be encouraged to gain practical experience.
Financial assistance to universities must not suddenly rise and fall over time. If a university is given a lot of resources now, it will be able to raise professorial salaries and hire internationally acclaimed professors. However, the risk is that big increases in funding can suddenly dry up, forcing a school to cut back on salaries and making it impossible to hold on to internationally renown professors. Giving financial assistance to universities that perform well is the right thing to do, but that financing must be consistent and continue over an extended period of time, rather than the current approach of spending NT$50 billion over five years. A sudden increase in funding of that magnitude will only make it difficult to spend the money where it counts.
We should have a university system that we develop to meet our country’s particular needs. We should of course be in step with international academia, but we should also stop focusing on wildly fluctuating rankings, because that will only end up creating a lot of trouble for ourselves. Financial assistance to universities should continue, but it should be consistent.
Lee Chia-tung is an honorary professor at National Tsing Hua University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations