How many people in the world’s towns and cities can drink the water in their tap without risking their health? The answer is probably impossible to determine. Indeed, the UN uses the term “improved” sources of water to describe what is supplied in many urban areas around the world. Unfortunately, “improved” does not always mean “clean” or “safe.”
This year’s update of the WHO’s report Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation estimates that at least 96 percent of urban dwellers in emerging economies like China, India, Thailand and Mexico have access to “improved” sources of water. Yet a study carried out by the Asian Institute of Technology found that less than 3 percent of Bangkok’s residents drink water directly from the tap, because they do not trust its quality.
TWO BILLION
Visit any major city in an emerging economy, from Mexico City to Mumbai, and you will be hard pressed to find anyone who believes that the water piped into their homes is fit to drink. Estimates by the Third World Center for Water Management indicate that more than 2 billion people do not trust the quality of the water to which they have access.
It doesn’t have to be like this. In the Cambodian capital of Phnom Penh, one official has shown that good management of this precious resource can make a difference. When Ek Sonn Chan became director-general of the Phnom Penh Water Supply Authority nearly 20 years ago, the city had a dismal water supply, with nearly 83 percent lost to leakages and unauthorized connections.
With a low-key but firm management style, Chan began to turn things around. He built up the authority’s capacity by training and rewarding his most effective staff and refusing to tolerate corruption. After just a year on the job, the authority’s technical and performance indicators started to improve.
Fifteen years after he took over, annual water production had increased by more than 400 percent, the water distribution network had grown by more than 450 percent and the customer base had increased by more than 650 percent.
5 PERCENT LOSSES
Today, the authority says that there are no unauthorized connections in Phnom Penh. Losses from the water system are just over 5 percent, similar to what one would find in Singapore or Tokyo, two of the best water-supply systems in the world. Thames Water, a utility in Britain, reported losses in 2010 that were five times that rate. By most performance indicators, Phnom Penh now has a better water-supply system than London or Washington.
Perhaps more remarkable is that Phnom Penh’s water-supply business model works. All consumers are metered, and both rich and poor pay for the water that they consume, which costs 60 to 80 percent less than it did when people bought untreated water from private street vendors, an unreliable source in more ways than one. Today, the city’s poorest households receive drinkable piped water around the clock.
The authority recovers all of its operating costs from tariffs and must depreciate its assets with time. More than 94 percent of supplied water is billed and the collection rate has been close to 100 percent for more than 10 years. The authority shows that good management of urban water resources is not only financially viable in emerging economies, but also benefits the whole population.
All people have a right to the water that they need for drinking, cooking and cleaning. Yet, around the world, political and business leaders still make excuses for the lack of clean and safe drinking water in our towns and cities.
The arguments are well rehearsed: water scarcity, lack of investment funds, the inability of the poor to pay for water and inadequate access to technology. However, in our view, these claims are merely attempts to hide real problems. Poor governance is no excuse. Neither is the absence of political will to charge people for the water that they consume, even if doing so would ensure a more reliable supply.
Cambodia has shown that you can achieve a great deal within a decade. If Phnom Penh — with all of its financial, technical and institutional challenges — can do it, why not other urban centers in emerging markets elsewhere?
Peter Brabeck-Letmathe is chairman of Nestle and chairman of the global public-private partnership 2030 Water Resources Group. Asit K. Biswas is the founder and president of the Third World Center for Water Management in Mexico and distinguished visiting professor at the Lee Kuan Yew School for Public Policy in Singapore and the Indian Institute of Technology in Bhubaneswar, India.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry