The eighth legislature has now been in session for a month. In some respects it has been a breath of fresh air, but in others it has fallen short of public expectations.
Let us first take a look at the more positive aspects. Not long after the session began, legislators from different parties held two joint press conferences where they spoke up for the conservation of wetlands and forests.
This was praised by the public, largely because it showed that the legislature does not have to be an arena solely for partisan infighting.
Most of the participants in the two press conferences were legislators-at-large, a testament to the efficacy of the legislator-at-large system, which is designed to force parties to consider how best to represent different sectors of society when making their nominations.
Doing so should provide guarantees of political participation for women and disadvantaged groups, and give academics and experts the opportunity to participate in the legislative process, thus elevating the quality of legislation.
Looking back at the elections for the seventh legislature in 2008, legislators-at-large were criticized as tools of factional compromise and patronage, and only a few made any effort to act in accordance with public opinion. In contrast, the legislator-at-large nominations for the elections on Jan. 14 included several representatives from disadvantaged groups and non-profit organizations.
At the time, the parties nominating these candidates received praise and perhaps a substantial number of additional votes. Now, however, is the time to see whether these legislators-at-large really are expressing what the public feels.
Regrettably, several of the individuals who were so well received by the public during the election campaign have more recently declined to declare their views on such major issues as whether a zero-tolerance policy should be applied to leanness-enhancing feed additive residue in imported beef.
Others have called press conferences to defend their positions, but only succeeded in raising questions about potential abuses of power. Many of the legislators-at-large who were originally seen as improving the image of their party are now being ridiculed and called “the shame of NGOs.”
Furthermore, legislators-at-large are under no pressure from legislative constituencies, and are therefore in a better position to serve as “public mouthpieces.” This is also the reason why legislators-at-large should display moral strength, courage and independence in their political activities. If they fail to do so, then we could nominate representatives of disadvantaged groups, experts and academics to every single legislative seat and it would still make no difference.
It is time our legislators-at-large began to earn their keep.
Ku Chung-hwa is chairman of Citizen’s Congress Watch.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.