It was the greatest political upheaval in years, but it may not be the last. China’s dramatic ousting of leadership contender Bo Xilai (薄熙來) on Friday last week might have been an anomaly — or it may be a sign of trouble ahead as the world’s second-largest economy prepares for a once-in-a-decade power transition.
This autumn, the 18th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party will formally select the next general secretary and other members of China’s top political body. Since power flows from the party, the decision — in reality, made before the meeting — will determine who will lead the country and how they will govern its 1.4 billion inhabitants. Bo’s high-profile campaigning, which unsettled other leaders, was only the most visible sign of the jockeying for position.
“My guess is that it’s going to be a bumpier ride than 10 years ago,” Jean-Pierre Cabestan of Hong Kong Baptist University said.
Wu Qiang (吳強), a political scientist at Tsinghua University, said: “This is the most intense moment in the past 15 years and it could have a big impact on society. The upcoming political competition is healthy and worth anticipating, but it could potentially result in instability.”
This is the first transition that has not been shaped by the founders of the People’s Republic of China — Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) was picked by Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平). His ascension was the first relatively straightforward succession in the country’s history.
Xi Jinping (習近平) will almost certainly become general secretary, then president of China, with Li Keqiang (李克強) as premier. The rest of the incumbents are expected to make way for newer faces — and perhaps the first woman ever to reach the body.
They will face a far more difficult time than their predecessors, said Cheng Li (李成), a specialist on China’s elite politics at the Brookings Institution in Washington.
“There are serious economic, political and social challenges. State monopolies, inflation, a property bubble, huge local debts — each of those things is so overwhelming,” Cheng said. “Internationally, China faces a very uncertain and complicated environment. It’s not a very nice picture.”
China is vastly wealthier and more powerful than when Hu took power a decade ago. Yet analysts say his legacy is one of maintenance — keeping GDP growth high and preserving party consensus. Critics complain that even much-needed measures, such as improvements to social welfare, have skirted the underlying issues.
Breakneck economic development has come at vast social and environmental cost. Corruption is rife — cynicism even more so. While millions have emerged from poverty, many feel worse off — perhaps because inequality has soared. Protests and other disturbances are increasing.
This year has seen fresh unrest in Tibetan and Uighur areas. Even the demographics look grim, with a rapidly ageing population.
Reforms have reached a critical stage, outgoing Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) warned last week. Political changes are necessary to reform the economy — and without them, China risks another historical tragedy like the cultural revolution, he said.
Some see Wen as disingenuous — others as isolated.
He has repeatedly called for change, though never quite so strongly, and little has happened.
Zhang Jian (張健) of Peking University said: “There’s a strong demand from civil society for more reforms ... I don’t see a serious or reliable force within the party that really wants them.”
However, Russell Leigh Moses, a political analyst in Beijing, suggested that on economic issues, at least, “there’s a good deal of healthy rethinking in leadership circles.”
A government research body co-wrote last month’s World Bank report calling for economic reforms — Li reportedly arranged the collaboration.
“I feel a polarization process between conservatives and reformers on substantive political issues, and fundamental orientations is going on,” Cabestan said. “The big uncertainty is whether something creates a showdown.”
Opportunities for change will depend on who joins the standing committee of the politburo, the top political body, and who takes other senior roles. The general secretary is now first among equals, not a paramount leader like Mao Zedong (毛澤東) or Deng.
Since them, “the committee has been led by all the members together and the factional fighting has been fierce,” said Zhang Ming (張鳴), a political scientist at Renmin University of China in Beijing.
The leadership is often divided into “princelings” such as Xi — the sons of powerful Chinese Communist Party leaders — and members of Hu’s Communist Youth League faction. However, such distinctions not only reflect the importance of connections and powerful patrons, to some extent they are used as a proxy for political differences.
This autumn’s promotions will offer clues to Xi’s ability to impose his will, as will the speed with which he takes over as chair of the party’s central military commission.
The standing committee “will also tell us about policy orientation — whether it will be a ‘status quo’ leadership or one ready to take more daring decisions, initiate more reforms and to some degree take risks,” Cabestan said.
“If, for example, Wang Yang (汪洋) [the Guangdong Chinese Communist Party boss seen as relatively reformist] is promoted to a key position, that may make a difference,” he added.
Meaningful change — particularly political reform — will be hard to effect, Cheng warned.
The congress’ 70 richest members added more to their wealth last year than the combined net worth of the US Congress, the US president and his Cabinet, and US supreme court justices, Bloomberg reported recently. Their average worth of US$1.28 billion not only makes the favorite for the Republican presidential candidacy, Mitt Romney, look impecunious, it indicates how intertwined political and economic power have become.
“The big question for Xi [is] whether behind his smile and urbane manner he can really be tough when he needs to be,” Cabestan said.
Kerry Brown, director of the Asia program at Chatham House in London, said: “For me, 2012 onwards is going to be a transition from GDP growth to sociopolitical change and the return of politicians — technocrats being replaced by people who actually have to communicate to the public what the policy options are and which choices should be taken, and try to build not just consensus in the party, but in society.”
“The new leaders are more reformist in their provincial levels. It’s a question of what they attack and the speed at which they take those issues. I guess they will be gradualist and my instinct is that they will have to hit these quicker than they expected. Tensions have grown and it isn’t sustainable,” Brown said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.