This is the economy election, right? Tell to that to the world.
US President Barack Obama is getting another dose of the reality of his job: the out-of-his-control events that shape whether he will keep it.
He is lobbying Israel not to launch on attack on Iran that could set the Middle East on fire and pull the US into another war. He is struggling to get world powers to unite on halting a massacre in Syria. He is on the defensive about staying in Afghanistan after a US soldier allegedly went on a killing spree against civilians.
And back home, where the economy is king, everyone is talking about the price of gasoline. Which, as Obama cannot say enough, no one can control right now.
The Republican presidential hopefuls do not have to worry as much about all this because they do not have the responsibility of governing — a luxury Obama likes to note, although he enjoyed the same when he was the challenger. The Republicans, though, are being drawn into events beyond their preferred message of the day.
For Obama, whose re-election bid looks rosier with every good month of job creation, the political risk in the least is that he gets knocked off message. That happened on Monday, when Obama and the White House spent a lot of effort trying to focus on energy, but the dominant news was the horrific rampage in Afghanistan.
The bigger worry for Obama is that all the outside events conspire to sour the public mood, give people more to worry about and create an opening for Republicans to challenge his leadership. Just because presidents may not be able to control problems does not mean they do not get blamed for them.
“There are so many of them now, and dire ones,” said Barbara Perry, who researches the US presidency at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center. “People may not care much about what Israel is doing, or even what Iran is doing, but given American dependence on Mideast oil, that has a direct impact on the pocket book. Do these things inevitably have an impact on the campaign? Absolutely, because they will be the questions put to the presidential candidates.”
As one example, the price at the pump carries political risk for Obama, who is taking a pounding over the issue in the polls.
The average price for a liter of gasoline is now about US$1, the highest ever for this time of year. The White House says anyone suggesting a quick fix is lying to voters. Instead, Obama pushes energy exploration across the board and reminds people he championed a payroll tax cut that kept money in their pockets.
That does not offer as much election-year satisfaction for the typical commuter.
“The reality is that the oil prices and the gas prices that we pay here in the United States are set on the global market,” US Interior Secretary Ken Salazar told reporters on Monday. “We don’t set them, and we don’t control them. This president and this Congress can’t control those prices.”
Clearly. Obama has gotten used to this dynamic.
Good news has come before on the economy, only to be suffocated by outside events. Just a few months ago, Obama attributed a slowing economy to the Japanese tsunami, the Arab Spring and the European debt crisis (not to mention his ugly showdown with Congress over a near-government default.)
Now sizable job growth has taken hold by the month, but that pattern is hardly assured through election day. Obama still has a wary eye on Europe’s economic stability, a slowdown in China could undermine the US, and the turmoil surrounding Iran and Israel could further jolt gas prices and, perhaps, lead to war.
It was a telling sign when Obama held his first news conference of the year last week and got not one question on the economy writ large. The focus was on the threat of a preemptive Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear sites. Now the attention is back on the Afghanistan war as Obama warns against a hasty retreat.
So it goes for presidents.
The big problems of the day are covered by the media, evaluated by pollsters and viewed within the election context.
Still, the general election campaign is expected to come down to which contender has better answers for people looking for a job, a better career, a way to keep their house, a sense of security.
“The three most important issues of the election are the economy, the economy and the economy,” Obama campaign adviser Robert Gibbs said.
Indeed, an Associated Press-GfK poll of issues last month found 91 percent of people said the economy was highly important to them. Obama’s team says the choice for voters is about restoring US security for all or going back to a free-for-all approach that led to the crisis. Republicans say he has failed to lead.
The White House is not out to make this election about foreign policy, but Gibbs said: “I don’t think it hurts” if the conversation turns that way.
Obama has a story to tell on the killing of former al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, the ending of the war in Iraq, the squeezing of Iran through sanctions.
The direction of the war in Afghanistan has been on that list too, but now it is a question, and Obama has to answer.
Afghanistan is raging with anti-Americanism after US troops burned Korans last month and, over the weekend, a soldier allegedly killed 16 Afghan civilians and burned many of the bodies.
Obama was questioned about the horrific incident by TV reporters from around the nation. They had been invited to the White House to talk about energy, but they pushed him on when the US will be getting out of Afghanistan too. Obama said the US must not rush to the exits.
So the timetable remains: The end of 2014, at the latest, for Americans to get out of a combat role in Afghanistan.
And this one: a little under nine months left for any issue in the world to rock Obama’s re-election bid.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations