If inflation is a dragon that must be slain, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) has shown he is willing to sacrifice a part of the country’s most vital asset to do so — growth.
Cutting China’s economic growth target for this year to 7.5 percent at the start of the annual meeting of the National People’s Congress last week says clearly that too rapid an expansion makes inflation too tough to contain, given the reforms needed to create widespread wealth.
That he did so in the week it was revealed that the annual rate of inflation last month receded to a 20-month low of 3.2 percent, barely seven months after being twice that at a three-year peak of 6.5 percent, speaks volumes about the gravity of price risks.
“The fact that we’re talking about the question recognizes the fact that it’s not a slam-dunk that the inflation beast has been tamed,” said Jeremy Stevens, China economist at Standard Bank Group in Beijing.
“The average January to February inflation rate is 3.9 percent and only a fraction below the government’s target for the full year,” Stevens said. “Most people believe that in the second half of the year, the inflation rate picks up again.”
The growth and inflation trade-off is particularly pointed for Wen and the Chinese Communist Party leadership, which justifies its one-party grip on power with the promise of stability and prosperity for the country’s 1.3 billion people, most poor — an estimated 10 percent live on less than US$1 per day.
The country’s economic ascent has increasingly concentrated riches in the hands of an urban elite in the past decade, during which China has become the world’s second-biggest economy and it has accumulated US$3.2 trillion of foreign exchange reserves — the largest store of foreign wealth on the planet.
Wen needs wages for the country’s 800 million mainly low-paid workers to rise quickly enough to help bridge the chasm between rich and poor, while pursuing painful structural reforms to increase domestic demand and cut dependence on volatile exports, and foreign capital inflows.
Because inflation is the surest way to ignite the social unrest that most worries the party — given that the poor spend almost all of their income on basic essentials — he must do it while keeping a lid on costs.
The consensus in a latest poll is that inflation will be within the government’s 4 percent forecast for the year, but with a dip down to 3.1 percent by the third quarter; the implication is for a rebound in the fourth quarter, a worry for policymakers as most of the anticipated fall in the rate of inflation in the first half will come from the base effects of last year’s surge.
Societe Generale economists calculate that fully 1.2 percentage points of the 1.3 percentage point fall in the January to February inflation rate came from base effects.
HSBC, the bank which confidently declared that the “inflation story is over” in a note to clients after data on Friday showed last month’s year-on-year consumer price inflation at 3.2 percent, seems to be hedging its bets.
Its China economics team expects at least 100 basis points of cuts in reserve ratio requirements by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) for the rest of the year, after cuts of 50 basis points last month and in November last year.
That compares with the market consensus of 150 basis points more and archrival Standard Chartered’s 200 basis points call, to keep the economy gliding as growth slows.
“The point is to make sure there are smooth liquidity conditions that are supportive to growth, but not necessarily a very aggressive easing that would invite future inflation risks,” HSBC China economist Sun Junwei (孫俊偉) said.
In other words, a decision to ease monetary policy is not necessarily about having snuffed out inflation risks at all.
Indeed, those risks start to loom larger barely six months from now and they grow even more intense when inflation is viewed as an expression of economic constraint — too little supply relative to demand — rather than expansion.
China has a shrinking labor force, mandated double-digit wage increases, an export sector losing its competitive cost advantage and an insatiable thirst for raw material imports.
“With China’s working-age population set to decline steadily from 2012 onward due to retirement, the notion that a minimum of 8 percent GDP growth is necessary to sustain full employment and preserve social stability is now outdated,” analysts at Nomura said in a note to clients.
It also means that inflationary pressures will build at a much lower rate of growth going forward, a fact unlikely to be lost on China’s leadership, which has seen periods of high inflation often coincide with protests and social unrest.
The government is already raising the energy prices it controls, using the leeway of slackening demand created by the economic slowdown it partly engineered, and analysts expect further reforms in electricity, natural gas and water.
Such reforms inevitably lift prices, increasing the urgency of planned social security, health and tax reforms to boost disposable income in households that last year was just 6,977 yuan (US$1,107) in rural areas and 21,810 yuan in urban areas.
Meanwhile, the risk of a spike in food prices persists. An investigation based on assessments by key trading houses, cooperatives and an influential consultancy suggests that Beijing has overstated the corn crop by the equivalent of between 12 days and 44 days of consumption, a gap big enough to drive up global grain prices if the authorities act to close it.
That would in turn raise the price of Chinese pork — the country’s most popular meat is a key determinant of inflationary expectations — which is already 86 percent higher than US hog prices, according to Colorado consultancy Global Agritrends.
Analysts at UBS reckon China’s overall consumption growth will be 9.3 percent this year, firmly ahead of the bank’s forecast for GDP growth at 8.5 percent, meaning the whiff of inflation will be pretty strong in a US$7.5 trillion economy that is bustling along quite speedily.
“I think you need to look carefully at the fact that the PBOC has specifically trodden cautiously in this cycle,” Stevens said, pointing out that the relative tightness of policy settings now is a consequence of having eased too aggressively after the 2008-2009 financial crisis. “This time around there does seem to be a genuine desire to be gradualist in the approach in how to deal with supporting economic activity.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry