It is more than a week since Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平) concluded his visits to the US, Ireland and Turkey and returned to Beijing.
Following Chinese Communist Party (CCP) convention, these visits have been characterized as “introductory” trips. The party hopes that this diplomatic exercise will allow the Western world, and in particular the US, to get to know the man that is being touted as China’s “leader-in-waiting.” However, what has it achieved? I believe there are both positive and negative sides to this.
The positives first: Xi was able to do something Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) failed to achieve before he took office. Senior members of the CCP have an issue with image. It has been pointed out that, unlike Hu, Xi at least knows how to smile. This is a very important part of one’s image.
When Hu first became leader, people in English-speaking countries in the West would ask, “Who is Hu?” Now that Hu is about to step down, my feeling is that this question is still waiting for an answer. Hu is seen as a rather dour figure who is very difficult to read. At first, the outside world thought he was just adept at being inscrutable. Now they have started to suspect that there is not really all that much behind the facade.
On his trip, Xi showed a side of himself very different from Hu’s image. He was willing to express his own opinion about things. He apparently showed a deep understanding of the US system when he talked to US Vice President Joseph Biden, and was a little more forthcoming on the issue of human rights, hinting that he knew things were not ideal, when he said: “There is no best, there is only better.” One could say this was a little abstruse and ambiguous, but at least it was a new approach.
In Ireland, he was conspicuously more relaxed, even demonstrating his soccer skills. This did his personal image no end of good in the West.
In view of his possible future role as leader of a world power, this was a good start.
The negative aspects: I believe that the main issue was that he betrayed a lack of self-confidence.
The US leg of the trip was aimed at his getting closer to the US public, but he ended up keeping a distance from two groups: the press and the Chinese community. During previous US visits by Chinese leaders, there have been various events arranged in which they could meet with the mainstream press to make known their ideas, but these were few and far between during Xi’s visit. Neither did he seem all that keen to mingle with the Chinese community there.
During a banquet in Los Angeles, he spent two hours glued to his chair, declining to walk around the venue and chat with guests who had paid substantial amounts of money for the privilege of attending. One can understand where he was coming from in his dealings with these two groups. He was clearly being cautious, knowing full well that the more he said, the more chance he had of putting his foot in his mouth.
However, his caution also revealed two things: first, his lack of confidence in himself and, second, that he still does not have the authority to pronounce on Chinese affairs. There has been talk that both Xi and Li Keqiang (李克強) — likely the next Chinese premier — have already taken on the responsibilities of their future positions, before they officially start, and have already begun to make their own decisions on important issues. However, from Xi’s manner over the course of this trip it would seem that this is not the case, as otherwise he would not have been so cautious.
This degree of caution detracted from the significance of his trip. This trip was supposed to show people in the West something of the man, what he looks like, what he sounds like. In these terms it was a success, but they still do not know much about what his ideas are. He made a few friends, but these friends are going to want to know more about what makes him tick.
Wang Dan is a visiting assistant professor in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences at National Tsing Hua University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry