It has been reported that funding for the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City (新北市), being constructed by Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) will be increased again and that the date for it to enter commercial operation could be delayed by a further 39 months, until 2016, or maybe even 2019. It also looks unlikely that the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant, in Shihmen District (石門), or the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant, in Wanli (萬里), both in New Taipei City, will be closed down ahead of schedule.
Before the Jinshan and Guosheng plants are closed, the impact of not having the fourth plant online will be minimal. However, if it is not up and running when these plants are taken offline as planned, at the beginning of 2019, the impact will be felt immediately and will become greater with each passing year, as demand for electricity increases.
During peak hours, high demand in northern Taiwan means a large amount of electricity has to be transmitted from central and southern Taiwan. The long distances involved in the transmission lowers the safety of the electricity supply and raises the risk of usage restrictions.
If Taipower does not come up with a solution to the problem in the next few years and develop other power sources or ways to control demand, it will have a tough time maintaining the safety of the supply.
Every four to six years, Taipower produces a master plan for electricity transmission, involving construction work that costs tens to hundreds of billions of New Taiwan dollars. Such plans benefit the development of domestic industry and employment, which need to make their own projections about power supply and demand.
However, these infrastructure projects are not well received by the public. In order to meet demand for short-term peaks, a lot of money and time has been spent on building additional power plants, transmission lines and transformers. However, urban transmission and distribution grids are still heavily loaded.
We need to know exactly how much electricity Taiwan needs. In the absence of economic supply and demand equilibrium theory, excessive demand cannot be handled no matter how much power-generating infrastructure is built. It will only cause even more environmental destruction and the public will have to pay an even higher price for electricity.
At the end of last year, the government convened a forum on smart grid development, and it appeared officials intended to create a better environment for smart grid providers, given the future supply challenges. Unfortunately, Taipower did not explain in detail the difficulties and challenges it is facing.
As lawmaking and policy cannot be coordinated and the upper management at Taipower has no professional engineering staff capable of finding creative solutions to problems, Taiwan’s electricity supply problems will continue. The company must take a more active role and spend money where it counts to solve future problems with the joint participation of smart grid providers and electricity users.
Judging by the administration’s current actions, officials must believe Taiwan has abundant electricity supply for present and future needs. If the administration fails to see the crux of the problem, instead concentrating on setting new records for annual electricity usage instead of managing demand and educating the public in how to handle electricity shortages or power cuts, both the government and the public will suffer when these begin to happen.
Lu Chan-nan is a professor at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under