Beijing has reportedly drafted new policy guidelines for cross-strait relations that include reaching out to those who do not support the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), trying to exert more influence over the Taiwanese media and helping Taiwanese companies in China improve their operations. The trouble is, Beijing has already proven its ability to exert a great deal of influence over Taiwan’s media, and while its methods may be changing, the goal remains the same: annexation.
These new policies were reportedly the result of several brainstorming sessions among those in the Taiwan Affairs Office and others in charge of cross-strait affairs in the wake of Taiwan’s Jan. 14 elections and were supposedly in play during the recent visit by Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits Deputy Chairman Zheng Lizhong (鄭立中), which focused on the pro-green areas of southern Taiwan.
China has been ramping up its media manipulation ever since the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement was signed in June 2010. On Monday, the Foundation for the Advancement of Media Excellence noted that some Taiwanese newspapers had run news stories from China’s state media and published news reports paid for by China without informing their readers, with about 200 “ads” paid for by Chinese government agencies published in local newspapers last year.
The KMT government hasn’t complained or tried to take action because it is doing the same thing, with the foundation noting that the five biggest newspapers published more than 1,300 “ads” for the government in the second half of last year alone.
However, Beijing’s interest in additional manipulation of Taiwanese media has been sparked by its belief that local media outlets’ coverage helped convince many Taiwanese to support the so-called “1992 consensus” during the January elections, the Chinese-language United Daily News cited sources as saying.
Being able to determine the source of news is crucial to being an informed consumer and informed voter, and efforts by Beijing — or the KMT government — to hide their sponsorship of self-serving news articles and reports are despicable, and downright deadly to society, because the message that annexation is inevitable could easily become a drumbeat that few can march against.
No one should be in doubt of China’s intentions, even if it pretends to be playing nicer. Just ask the Chinese where playing nice will get them.
The Chinese were told this week the government plans to soften the slogans local authorities have used to push Beijing’s “one-child” policy. Instead of being told “We would rather scrape your womb than allow you to have a second child” or “If you don’t have your tubes tied, your house will be demolished,” they will hear “Caring for a girl means caring for the future of the nation,” the Shanghai Daily reported.
The paper said the National Population and Family Planning Commission wants to prevent zealous officials from “offending the public” or worsening social tensions.
The actual policy that has encouraged local family planning officials to use draconian measures, including forced late-term abortions, sterilization and monetary fines, to enforce the one-child policy is not being changed — nor are the quotas and targets that those officials have to meet — just the public facade is being polished.
That’s what Beijing is all about — its facade. Right now it is all about not “offending the public” or worsening social tensions both at home and in Taiwan. Which is why it is so important for the public to keep pushing the media into doing their job to probe behind China’s friendly facade and to protest at paid coverage. To trust the message, you have to be able to trust the messenger, and right now there is no reason to do so.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China