New concerns about “human safaris” are now being raised in Peru, where tour operators are profiting from the exploitation of indigenous tribes in the Amazon jungle.
An increase in economic activity and tourism in the Manu region has led to a dramatic rise in the number of reported sightings of the Mashco-Piro — one of around 15 indigenous groups in Peru who have no regular contact with outsiders, and one of only 100 or so such tribes left in the world.
Fenamad, the local indigenous rights organization, has criticized tour operators who have taken advantage of the sightings to take tourists “close to where” the tribespeople were seen. There is growing evidence that travelers and tourists are attempting to make contact. “Uncontacted Indians are not a tourist attraction,” said Rebecca Spooner of Survival International, which aims to protect tribal peoples. “So-called tour guides should already know better.”
Growing concerns over “human safaris” caused a scandal in India after the London-based Observer revealed how tour operators in the Andaman Islands are colluding with police to offer sightings of an indigenous group, the Jarawa, who have only had contact with the outside world since the late 1990s.
In Peru, the Mashco-Piro live in the Manu national park of the Madre de Dios region, near the Brazilian border. More than a century ago the Mashco-Piro were driven off their land in the upper Manu river by rubber tappers supplying the US and European car and bicycle industries. The tribe was forced to retreat to more remote jungle areas.
After Survival International published photographs of the tribe last month to publicize the need to leave it in peace, a spokesman for Peru’s national protected areas department urged people to steer clear of “communities trying to remain apart from the outside world.”
However, our independent research has confirmed that unscrupulous tour guides are flouting that advice.
“The uncontacted peoples have been sighted on the Madre de Dios River in Manu. Let me know how many days you want and I’ll suggest a tailor-made program for your party,” said one, contacted anonymously with a specific request to seek out the tribe. “We can’t be 100% sure we can see the uncontacted. If we are lucky we can see. In 2011 they came out in the months of May and October,” another said.
“The best time to see these uncontacted natives is towards the end of the dry season, when the turtles are laying their eggs along the riverbank,” a third operator said. “The best chance you would have to see them is between July and September. Along the main rivers is the best place ... The tour with the greatest amount of distance covered and the best chance to see the uncontacted natives would be our eight-day/seven-night tour to Manu Biosphere Reserve by bus that starts and ends in Cuzco.”
However, other tour operators gave a markedly different response.
Manu Nature Tours, based in Cuzco, said: “We do not offer any possibility to see [the tribe]. It is very dangerous to attempt any contact with them. A simple cold can kill them all. Any attempt to try to contact this people can put you in jail in Peru and Brazil.”
Atalaya Tours said: “It is completely forbidden to contact ‘non-contact people.’ We have tours to Manu park, but Atalaya fully respects all the laws protecting non-contact natives and we don’t agree with the illegal guides or operators that try to commercialize these kinds of visits.”
According to Fenamad, “there’s great concern because the Mashco-Piro are very vulnerable. In addition to their susceptibility to common diseases and epidemics, the sightings are occurring in an area of open-river transit where there is an intense traffic of commercial and tourists’ boats.”
Glenn Shepard, an anthropologist who has worked in Manu, says tour operators have approached the Mashco-Piro on the riverbank so that tourists can “get photos like they would for a jaguar.”
In India, tourists plunge into the heart of Jarawa territory along the Andaman Trunk Road, while in Peru they travel down the Madre de Dios River, where the Mashco-Piro have been seen on the left bank, or up and down the River Manu, where they have been seen on both banks.
Video footage of the Mashco-Piro emerged last year that appeared to show travelers “playing a game of cat and mouse with the naked tribesmen” and discussing whether to leave food or clothing for them on the riverbank.
None of the trips to Manu advertised by tour operators on their Web sites openly offers Mashco-Piro sightings, but several acknowledge the presence of “uncontacted” people in the rainforest.
“We need governments to act to protect indigenous communities, tour operators need to follow a code of conduct and tourists need to be educated and informed,” said Mark Watson, director of Tourism Concern.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with