In August 1842, the British government of Queen Victoria forced the Chinese government of the Daoguang Emperor (道光帝) to sign the Treaty of Nanking to acknowledge China’s defeat in the Opium War, to require China to pay a large indemnity and to cede the port of Hong Kong to Britain.
That treaty and 172 ensuing pacts, agreements and statements recorded what Chinese of all political stripes have called the “Century of Shame.” During that time, Western European nations, Russia, the US and Japan all carved out “spheres of influence” that turned many Chinese cities and provinces into colonies of the foreign powers.
Today, that treasure trove of China’s tribulations, once stored away and ignored, has been resurrected and put on display by the government of the Republic of China (ROC) in Taiwan. It can be seen on the Internet in Chinese and English on two Web sites: www.npm.gov.tw/exh100/diplomatic/ and npmhost.npm.gov.tw/tts/npmkm2/10010.html.
In addition, a book, also in Chinese and English, carrying reproductions of all the documents has gone into its third printing. Earlier this month, an exhibition of the documents closed at the National Palace Museum, just north of Taipei, after being seen by 1.7 million people, including visitors from China.
This project reflects the essence of the 63-year dispute between the governments in Taipei and Beijing. It is intended “to show to the world the legitimacy of the Republic of China,” said Philip T.Y. Wang (王贊禹), director-general of the Department of Archives and Information Management in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
In China, the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) asserts that Taiwan is a Chinese province that should come under Beijing’s rule. Wang said the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations, Japan’s instrument of surrender to the ROC in World II, and the peace treaty between the ROC and Japan refute the PRC’s claim.
Unspoken in the rivalry between Taiwan and China is the contrast between the destruction of historical archives and cultural sites during the Cultural Revolution generated by Communist leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東) from 1966 to 1976 and Taiwan’s efforts to preserve Chinese culture and history today.
A sidelight: At a time when treaties were often handwritten, the Chinese calligraphy in bold strokes and the flowing penmanship in English, French and occasionally other European languages are artistically appealing.
After the Treaty of Nanking, there followed for the next 60 years a flock of similar treaties, many of them signed in the port city of Tientsin, now known as Tianjin. Eventually, China made concessions to France, Britain, Japan, Russia, Italy, Germany, Austria-Hungary and Belgium to turn that port into an international city.
In 1895, having lost a war with Japan, the Chinese signed the Treaty of Shimonoseki, a coastal city in Japan, in which Taiwan was ceded to Japan. In other agreements about that time, China ceded suzerainty, or dominion, over Vietnam to France, which incorporated the country into its Indochina colony.
In China’s revolution, World Wars and civil strife in the first half of the 20th Century, the documents were shuttled around China for safekeeping. In 1948, they were shipped with other government files in 60 crates to Taiwan when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) forces were driven out of China. The documents were stored and forgotten.
The director of the museum in 2000, Chin Hsiao-yi (秦孝儀), suggested to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs that the documents, which had become fragile, be transferred to the museum where specialists could preserve them. The ministry agreed and assigned Wang, who had been Taiwan’s consul-general in Honolulu, Hawaii, to help manage the transfer after he returned to Taipei.
Out of that effort came the exhibition entitled A century of resilient tradition, the book of the same title and the Web sites.
The first site focuses on the museum exhibit, while the second is intended to be a permanent repository of the documents that makes them accessible to historians, researchers and students.
The second site will take four to six months to complete because each of the fragile documents must be carefully prepared and digitized for the Web site.
Richard Halloran is a commentator based in Hawaii.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under