Different opinions have emerged as to why Representative to Singapore Vanessa Shih (史亞平) is being reassigned, and there is a wide divergence between the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ account and suggestions being bandied around by the news media. We don’t know the truth of the matter yet. However, the ministry needs to make clear what the ramifications are for national sovereignty, democratic principles and the conduct of our envoys.
One of the suggestions is that Shih flew the Republic of China (ROC) flag and sang the ROC national anthem during the ROC centenary celebrations in Singapore, in violation of that country’s observance of the “one China” policy. This was reportedly much to the annoyance of former Singaporean prime minister Lee Kuan Yew (李光耀) and other senior Singaporean officials, which would explain why they recently discontinued contact with senior Taiwanese officials.
As a representative of the ROC, there was nothing wrong with Shih’s conduct at the ceremony. The Taiwanese representative in any other country would have acted likewise. Since Singapore raised objections, the ministry should really have supported its representative office for maintaining national dignity, especially since the incident took place during the centenary celebrations. Singapore really shouldn’t have reacted as it did, coming out with guns blazing over the arrangements for a single event and making it all but impossible for Shih to remain in her post.
Another suggestion is that the Singaporean government was irked when Shih reportedly contacted individuals from the city-state’s opposition Workers’ Party (WP) during Singapore’s general elections in May last year, when she apparently discussed the Taiwanese background of WP member Chen Show Mao (陳碩茂). For the Singaporean government, this crossed the line. Again, there is nothing unusual about a representative expanding their contacts within the country they are stationed in. Talking with members of the opposition is part of their job. We know from leaked US cables that former American Institute in Taiwan director Stephen Young met with members of the opposition here. After all, developing a rapport with politicians in any country is exactly what diplomats should be doing. If Singapore finds fault with Shih for this, then its understanding of democracy and international conventions leaves much to be desired.
The third possibility is that there has been little concrete progress on negotiations for the Agreement between Singapore and the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu on Economic Partnership (ASTEP) after two years, and that Singapore is using this as an excuse to request Shih’s reassignment. However, the talks are currently stalled at Taiwan’s bottom line regarding financial services and agricultural imports from Singapore. There has yet to be a breakthrough in these talks, which concern the national and business interests of both sides. Unless either side changes their position, nothing is going to happen any time soon and the representative in Singapore doesn’t have control over this.
According to Minister of Foreign Affairs Timothy Yang (楊進添), Shih’s reassignment is simply a routine rotation within the ministry.
Whatever the reason for Shih’s reassignment, Singapore has made it abundantly clear that it has been dissatisfied with her, taking issue with the way she has conducted her official duties as well as her own personal style. It is important to recognize this.
Singapore might not be a big country, but Taiwan has enjoyed a special relationship with it and previous representatives there, such as Hu Shin (胡炘), Chiang Hsiao-wu (蔣孝武) and Hu Wei-chen (胡為真), had high profiles. The most pressing task for Taiwan and Singapore at the moment is the ASTEP talks, and it is important that the ministry chooses a suitable replacement for Shih, one who will ameliorate the process and not be an obstacle in it.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with