Two years after giving away the baby boy she had carried for nine months, Gao cries less. His new mom treats him well, and she finds comfort in the smiling family photos uploaded online. Besides, she has her own biological seven-year-old to care for — and she’s busy searching for another infertile couple seeking a womb.
Gao is one of China’s surrogate mothers working underground for vast sums of money to deliver children to wannabe parents. The “rent a womb” industry, which inhabits a legal gray area, came under fire in December when it emerged that a wealthy couple in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, paid nearly 1 million yuan (US$158,770) to have eight babies simultaneously, using two surrogates. For a country that limits families to one child, the babaotai chuanwen or “eight baby scandal” — unearthed when the babies’ portrait was used to advertise a photography studio — made national headlines.
As China enters the Year of the Dragon, the surrogate industry is preparing for an upswing in business with parents rushing to have a baby in the luckiest lunar year. Shanghai authorities expect 180,000 babies to be born this year, 10 percent more than last year, according to the Shanghai population commission. Countries with a strong Chinese diaspora typically experience a boom in “dragon” babies, as the creature is associated with might, intelligence and is historically linked to emperors.
Gao, who didn’t want to give her real name, also feels a sense of urgency.
“I hope I can find the next client before March, as I’m already 32 and the time left for me [to be a surrogate] is limited,” she said.
Like many surrogates, Gao is from one of China’s remote regions, in her case the most northeastern province, Heilongjiang.
Two years ago, she received 200,000 yuan for her services to an infertile, middle-aged couple from the affluent former capital, Nanjing. Surrogates can earn anything from 100,000 yuan to more than 300,000 yuan, approximately 120 times the average monthly salary of a graduate in Beijing. Though there is no specific law relating to surrogacy in China, in 2001 the industry was driven underground when the Ministry of Health banned trade in fertilized eggs and embryos, forbidding hospitals from performing surrogacy procedures.
Regulations are openly flouted. While there is no official count, the Guangzhou-based newspaper Southern Metropolis Weekly last year estimated that 250,000 surrogate children had been born in China in the past 30 years. More than 100 surrogacy agencies advertise online. Given that 10 percent of couples struggle with infertility — a rate that is on the rise according to the ministry — there is a potentially huge market for surrogacy in China.
“Parents living in Shanghai or Beijing have to travel to far-flung cities such as Wuhan, Harbin and Hohhot to meet a surrogate mother and find a hospital willing to finish the transplantation,” said Zhou, a surrogacy agent in Shanghai, who requested just her family name be used.
Most couple-surrogate pairings are arranged through Internet-based agencies, with agents expected to find one or two surrogates each month, earning 2,000 yuan for each, Zhou said.
During pregnancy, surrogates are often contractually obliged to reside in a “surrogate dorm,” where they share rooms, are cared for by nannies and are governed by a strict set of rules. At Zhou’s agency, violations include being awake after 9.30pm and telling friends and relatives the dorm’s whereabouts. Surrogates who flout the rules are subject to a fine (typically 500 yuan) and may lose their end of the contract.
Many infertile parents are willing to pay any price for a precious single child.
“You suffer psychological torture from the fear you will never have a child,” said Li, 42, a father whose child was born through a surrogate and who requested his name be changed. “Then you fear that something will happen when the surrogate mother is pregnant, and then, even when you have the child in your arms, you begin to worry that someone will discover the truth.”
Li, who owns a chain of restaurants in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, has a seven-year-old daughter, but is planning to have a dragon boy.
Though the ministry stipulates that the use of reproduction techniques such as in-vitro fertilization must conform to China’s “family planning policy,” surrogacy is one way moneyed parents bypass the one-child rule.
“There are some parents trying to avoid one-child policy by surrogacy, but I think the practice should be governed by some laws or rules,” said Zhai Zhenwu, director of Renmin University’s school of sociology and population.
“It’s unfair to poor citizens to whom it seems the rich can have as many children as they want. It’s another negative signal to society that money can buy anything, when we should be teaching people that the golden key can’t open every door,” Zhai said.
However, for women such as Gao, the decision to surrogate isn’t an ethical one: It provides her family with much-needed cash. Though her husband cared for her in their home during her first surrogacy, for the next Gao plans to move out of town.
“My relatives and neighbors would be skeptical if I tell them the baby is stillborn again,” she said.
Additional reporting by Xia Keyu
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations