Hacked e-mails believed to show correspondence between notorious Russian youth group Nashi’s first leader, Vasily Yakemenko, its spokesperson Kristina Potupchik and other activists, appear to reveal the group’s goals, priorities, means and concerns.
Many e-mails concern how to boost positive coverage on the Internet. One includes payments, noting that 200 pro-Putin online comments left on 60 articles cost 600,000 rubles (US$20,200). It also details paid-for coverage.
Two posts about Nashi’s summer camps on one of Russia’s most popular blogs, run by photographer Ilya Varlamov, received 300,000 hits and cost 400,000 rubles. Varlamov denied being paid to cover pro-Putin events. Another e-mail showed Nashi doled out 10 million rubles to buy articles about the Seliger summer camp in the tabloids.
Nashi targets people it considers “enemies,” such as Russian journalists and foreign ambassadors. In an e-mail to Potupchik on Oct. 27, one Nashi activist attached a list of 168 well-known human rights activists, writers, journalists, bloggers, directors, poets and others.
“These are the most vile enemies,” the activist writes. “Because they have personally gone after us or V.”
It is unclear to whom the “V” refers: Vladimir Putin, Vasily Yakemenko or Vladislav Surkov, the ideologue who dreamed up Nashi.
One of its top concerns is the opposition leader Alexei Navalny. In an e-mail on Nov. 11, an activist writes to Yakemenko with a plan for “a series of 40-to-50-second cartoons of a day in the life of the fascist Navalny,” comparing him to Adolf Hitler, showing him making uncontrollable Nazi salutes and forming swastikas.
“Let’s do it, make it funny,” Yakemenko replies, with a smiling emoticon.
A similar video went viral in December.
Several e-mails sent to Potupchik give accounts of the group’s monthly work and expenses. One account of the Saint Petersburg branch’s work in October includes a detailed list of the blogs attacked by Nashi commenters.
It said 10 activists, via 50 accounts on LiveJournal, Russia’s blogging platform of choice, and 50 Twitter accounts, could “regularly monitor LiveJournal publications” of bloggers, such as Navalny and fellow opposition leaders, Boris Nemtsov and Ilya Yashin.
“More than 1,200 comments were left,” it says. “Twelve publications on social-political themes and in support of the prime minister were written, and reposted more than 200 times,” noting that only half the budget of 300,000 rubles was spent.
In some e-mails, Nashi activists and bloggers complain of lack of, or late, payment.
“Why didn’t you tell me there would be no money? For me financial motivation was the most important thing,” one wrote.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry