At Davos last week, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria received an unexpected birthday gift from Microsoft founder Bill Gates, in the form of a US$750 million “promissory note” to help shore up its faltering finances.
In pledging his hefty financial support, Gates effectively rescued the fund’s 10-year birthday celebrations. Despite its staggering successes — including helping to put 3.3 million people on HIV/AIDS treatment, 8.6 million on anti-tuberculosis treatment and providing 230 million insecticide-treated nets for the prevention of malaria — the fund’s recent troubles had threatened to overshadow its accomplishments as it prepared to mark a decade as the world’s main financier of programs to fight these three global epidemics.
In recent years, the fund has been mired in much-documented struggles with corruption, management breakdowns and a crippling US$2 billion funding shortfall, all compounded by the swiftness of the global economic downturn and donor fatigue.
There are fears that the knock-on decision to suspend the fund’s 11th round of funding and not disperse any more money until 2014 will have catastrophic consequences. There are predictions that without continued support, countries such as Zambia and Malawi will struggle to keep pace with infection rates and keep people on lifesaving medication, impacting millions of vulnerable patients.
Gate’s pledge was a show of faith that provided more than just a much-needed cash boost as he urged donors and the world to keep confidence in the fund’s ability to “[get] so much bang for our buck.”
The fund hopes that this, coupled with the departure of its executive director, Michel Kazatchkine, and the commissioning of an independent review that recommended an overhaul of its grant management and financial practices, will help re-establish its reputation as it steps into its second decade.
While all of this is clearly good news for the beleaguered fund, some frontline agencies are still reluctant to join in the celebrations.
Medecins Sans Frontieres’ HIV adviser Sharonann Lynch said Gates’ cash should be a wake-up call for the fund’s new board to “get back to work.”
“When addressing epidemics, the No. 1 factor is speed — and this isn’t the time to hit the snooze button,” she said. “Over the past few years the sense of urgency which once defined the work of the fund has become greatly diminished and the board basically gave themselves a holiday, instead of stepping up and doing their job, and ensuring that the funding shortfall was made up. On the one hand, they have a new ambitious strategy for change, and on the other, they have effectively closed for business. It is this lack of coherence that we find troubling — and patients will come to find deadly.”
On the back of the new injection of funding, Medecins Sans Frontieres is pushing for the fund to hold an emergency donor conference so that affected countries can apply for new grants and expand life-saving treatment this year. It is also urging the fund to become more creative in ensuring that it does not get caught on the back foot of funding cuts again.
“On top of voluntary funding, we also need predictable mechanisms — such as the financial transaction tax currently being debated in Europe — with part of funds generated to be dedicated to global health, including the Global Fund,” Lynch said.
Richard Feachem, a founding executive of the fund in 2002 and now the director of the Global Health Group at the University of California, agrees that the fund must become more flexible.
“Times have changed since we founded the fund and I think [it] certainly should have been more agile in foreseeing the impact of the global financial crisis on its income and in re-engineering in ways that would allow continued progress in the light of constrained income,” Feachem said.
Feachem argues that to do this the fund now needs to focus strongly on value for money — an opportunity he believes has not yet been seized on by the management team as it scrambles to regroup.
“Despite the independent review, and the raft of recommendations and reforms, there needs to be a very strong move toward a cash-on-delivery or pay-for-performance model, which has not happened yet,” he said. “Such a model is perfect for the fund, is consistent with its founding principles, would help move the fund away from the problems of corruption and would improve efficiency enormously by, for example, setting a standard price for each unit of outcome or output.”
So how else can the fund ensure it regains momentum and moves forward into its second decade?
Alvaro Bermejo, executive director of the International HIV/AIDS Alliance and Global Fund board member, said the fund can no longer rely on the discourse of panic and emergency.
“It’s important to understand the context in which the fund was created in 2002, which was very much as an emergency response, something which people tend to forget now,” Bermejo said. “In this super-rapid scale-up, the discourse at the time was that we were in emergency, so of course there was going to be some corruption and some mismanagement, which was right in the start, but, as you develop and begin to know your enemy better, this has become insufficient.”
Bermejo said this has meant that as infection rates have started dropping, the fund’s rhetoric has effectively become counterproductive, feeding the perception among some donors that the emergency is over.
“Because the Fund didn’t adapt its message, it worked against the idea that there was still an urgent need for continued and sustained funding, and this needs to be urgently addressed,” he said.
He argues that now the fund needs to look toward the language coming from the US — from donors such as Bill Gates and politicians such as US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton — calling for the elimination and eradication of malaria and HIV/AIDS within a generation. This, he said, could provide the fuel needed to keep the engine of the fund running over the next decade.
“In Europe, we’re more scared of failure, so we don’t like words like eradication, but there is no standing still when it comes to fighting infectious diseases,” he said. “The fund has to find ways of re-injecting that urgency and determination back into its work over the next decade, even if infection rates continue to decline.”
Feachem said a “certain complacency” must now be rectified by creative and positive change. If this happens, he believes the fund can even expand its work to tackle other global health epidemics.
“The fund needs to continue to pioneer a model for development finance that is a 21st century model and not a 1960s model, as still practiced by most institutions. If continuing innovation can guide the development of the Global Fund, then I can see it eventually taking on additional tasks, such as maternal and neonatal health, and becoming a real force for long-term change,” he said. “However, in the short term, the main priority must be ensuring that the extraordinary progress in the fight against AIDS, TB and malaria achieved in the past 10 years does not get reversed.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations