Between 1996 and this year, Taiwanese voters elected three presidents in five direct presidential elections.
During the first direct presidential election in 1996, all the candidates acted like true gentlemen. This was of positive significance for the new electoral system. During the second election in 2000, the Chung Hsing Bills Finance case broke, and this affected the outcome. The night before the third election, in 2004, the March 19 assassination attempt on then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his vice president took place. The shadow of these two incidents has haunted every candidate since.
During the fourth election in 2008, both candidates were on their guard against anything similar to the Chung Hsing Bills scandal and the March 19 shooting. Luckily, nothing similar happened. Instead, a new discourse was proposed: the idea that supporting the pan-blue camp meant supporting China, and that supporting China meant selling out Taiwan — an idea intended to secure a Taiwan-centered government monopoly. However, this anachronistic discourse was rejected by voters, just as the political discourse of the authoritarian Martial Law-era was discarded as a result of Taiwan’s democratic development and relegated to the dustbin of history.
During the fifth presidential election last month, the three candidates accused one another of playing dirty tricks, but the criticisms were mainly technical in nature.
After 16 years and five presidential elections, Taiwan’s democracy has become more mature. After eight years, the ghosts of the 319 shooting and the Chung Hsing Bills scandal have started to fade away. The new discourse aimed at creating a Taiwan-centered government monopoly from 2008, too, has gradually been abandoned. These changes are symbolic of the consolidation of democracy in Taiwan, and of a shared victory for all Taiwanese.
One thing that is worth mentioning in the recent presidential election is the “China factor.” In Taiwan’s first direct presidential election in 1996, then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) threatened Taiwan with missile exercises. In the second election in 2000, then-Chinese premier Zhu Rongji (朱鎔基) issued verbal threats against Taiwan.
After Ma’s election in 2008, he pushed through the opening of the three direct cross-strait links and signed the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA).Sixteen other cross-strait agreements between the Straits Exchange Foundation and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait were also signed. This has resulted in the biggest change to cross-strait relations in 60 years.
In the final stage of the recent election campaign, the so-called “1992 consensus” became a hot, and maybe even critical, issue. This change gave the “China factor,” and especially the cross-strait economic factors, a new importance in Taiwan’s presidential elections.
In previous presidential elections, the US was always of greatest international significance, but in last month’s presidential election the China factor became at least as important. After 16 years of searching and learning, China’s leaders seem to have learned how to influence Taiwan’s presidential elections. From now on, they are likely to strengthen not only cross-strait economic ties, but also cultural and historical ties.
As this happens, the impact of the China factor on Taiwan’s future presidential elections will become even more unpredictable. This is a lesson of the latest presidential election that Taiwan’s current and future leaders, all Taiwanese, and the international community should think long and hard about.
Huang Huang-hsiung is founder of the Taiwan Research Fund.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and