The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) cannot avoid the issue of relations across the Taiwan Strait. Following its loss in the Jan. 14 presidential election, the party needs to consult widely and try to find a balance between globalization, cross-strait issues and upholding Taiwan’s identity, and go on to formulate arguments that most people can accept.
During her election campaign, DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) proposed what she called a “Taiwan consensus,” the main point of which was that Taiwan’s future should be decided by all its people, in the spirit of democracy and self-determination.
The DPP lost the presidential race, but it made substantial gains in the legislature and as the main opposition party it should play the role of overseeing the government.
Beyond that, the DPP should follow the British model by forming a shadow Cabinet whose role would be to put forward realistic views on major national policy issues, thereby showing itself to be capable of taking back the reins of government at any time. If the DPP can use the period between now and the next election to refine and reform itself, starting out with a fresh approach to cross-strait issues, that ought to be a positive step for the development of party politics in Taiwan.
Coming up with a set of standpoints on cross-strait relations that reflect changes in Taiwan’s geopolitical situation and can be accepted by the public is a key task that the DPP must tackle if it wants to hold the presidency again. President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) re-election should not be seen as merely a referendum on the so-called “1992 consensus,” nor does it mean that people don’t support the “Taiwan consensus” proposed by Tsai. The election result showed that both sides have a considerable degree of public support.
What complicates matters is that there is no way of knowing how many people cast their votes defensively, on the one hand fearing that an excessive reliance on China could whittle away Taiwan’s ability to decide its own future, while on the other hand worrying that moves toward independence would threaten cross-strait peace. Many voters wanted to avoid instability and the possible worst-case scenarios that might have resulted from it. This psychological factor can hardly be interpreted as an adherence to party ideologies, and such people can’t simply be categorized as swing voters. All you can say is that Taiwanese do not want to be “Finlandized.”
Taiwan does not want to provoke China militarily and it does not want to be marginalized in the global division of the manufacturing industry. The DPP sees how globalization is leading to an increasingly unequal “M-shaped society,” so it has called for measures to change this trend, such as care for the disadvantaged and innovation in local industry. In its election strategy, the party intentionally steered clear of issues related to China, but its opponents successfully hit back and gave the DPP a rough ride by labeling it as anti-China, anti-business and incapable of maintaining stability and growth.
The Ma administration and the Chinese government have an unspoken agreement to blur the issues of “one China” and national sovereignty. During his second term as president, Ma will face heavy pressure from China to engage in political negotiations. Will the two governments keep giving top priority to the economy, or will the economy become a means of promoting unification? The answer will become clear during the next four years. It is a key moment, and the DPP must not be absent from the process.
Lee Cheng-hung holds a doctorate in social science from National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry