President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) new Cabinet will soon be up and running. Although its members might seem very pleased with themselves, it is imperative that they do not underestimate the serious challenges facing the nation. Given that the European debt crisis is likely to have only a passing impact on Taiwan, the fundamental challenge remains economic restructuring and the ability to play a meaningful role in international economic integration.
These issues require not only political will on the part of the government, but also a softer approach that makes optimal use of integration and coordination capabilities.
On Jan. 1, when Taiwan was still in the throes of election fever, the free-trade agreement (FTA) between the US and South Korea came into effect. The US removed import taxes on 82 percent of all product categories of South Korean exports to the US. South Korea’s FTA partners now account for 60 percent of the global economy
Seoul has signed nine free-trade deals, among them agreements with ASEAN, India, the EU and the US. It is also engaged in FTA talks with another seven economic entities, and talks with China and Japan are scheduled to begin later this year.
By comparison, Taiwan has signed agreements with five Central American states. The nation is currently discussing another agreement with Singapore, but the trade volume covered by these deals accounts for only 3.6 percent of Taiwan’s total foreign trade. Late last year, Taiwan and New Zealand announced that they were evaluating the feasibility of an economic cooperation agreement, but in terms of trade volume that will make up just 0.2 percent of total foreign trade.
Ma hopes that Taiwan will be able to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) at some point in the next 10 years, but he still has not produced a plan to that end. Furthermore, given the speed at which East Asian economic integration is progressing, the question is whether Taiwan can afford to wait 10 years to join the TPP.
Taiwan’s ranking in the IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, improved from 18th in 2007 to 6th last year. However, a more realistic measure of national competitiveness would be to look at foreign investment, international capital flows and domestic investment in Taiwan.
In the three years after Ma’s election in 2008, annual real foreign investment fell by 50.8 percent, 33.4 percent and 29.1 percent, respectively. Even with the implementation of the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), foreign investment in Taiwan only increased by 7.6 percent last year, to US$3.4 billion. According to UN data, Taiwan’s foreign direct investment (FDI) as part of global FDI fell from 0.37 percent in 2007 to 0.31 percent in 2008, 0.25 percent in 2009 and 0.2 percent in 2010. This is less than the other three Asian tiger economies, and does not even amount to half of the FDI received by Vietnam.
A look at international capital flows, including both direct investment and securities investments, shows that Taiwan’s international competitive advantage is fast disappearing. Between 2000 and 2007, under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, average annual net international investment in Taiwan was a negative US$13.23 billion. Between 2008 and 2010, under the first Ma administration, the figure was a negative US$20.08 billion. During the first three quarters of last year, net international investment in Taiwan was a negative US$46.5 billion, a larger capital outflow than in any year in the past.
Taiwan’s domestic investment is increasingly losing its dynamism. During the 1990s, the real investment rate was 28 percent. During the eight years under the DPP it dropped to 23.7 percent. During Ma’s first four years in office, it fell further, to an annual average of 17.7 percent. Last year it remained low at 17.2 percent, the second-lowest on record.
The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics has forecast that the real investment rate for this year will drop to 16.6 percent, which would be yet another historic low.
While the ECFA presented an opportunity for cross-strait integration, it is only a framework agreement and will not strengthen Taiwan’s export competitiveness. In 2007, Taiwan accounted for 10.6 percent of China’s import market, a number that by 2010 had shrunk to 8.3 percent. By the time the ECFA early harvest list came into effect early last year, that share had dropped to 7.2 percent, and by December last year, it had fallen still further, to 6.8 percent.
Faced with the challenges posed by globalization, the pressures on Taiwan’s international competitiveness have increased sharply. It can only be hoped that the new Cabinet will be able to implement sweeping structural reform, overcome the difficulties faced by the nation in terms of its efforts to participate in international economic integration and bring change and reform to the national economy.
Tung Chen-yuan is a professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Development Studies.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry