Few people are as experienced at generating controversy as US essayist Caitlin Flanagan, who has previously incited female ire with her takes on everything from housewives (“Women have a deeply felt emotional connection to housekeeping”) and working mothers (“At a certain point a mother must choose between her work and her child”) to the flaws of Joan Didion.
Last week, Flanagan’s new book Girl Land, which argues that the Internet has a destabilizing effect on teenage girls, was published in the US, and promptly kickstarted an Internet war.
“The current culture, with its driving imperatives of exhibitionism, of presenting oneself to the world in the most forward and blasting way possible, has made the experience of Girl Land especially charged and difficult,” Flanagan writes. “There is no such thing as a private experience any more ... I would contend that [this] is most punishing to girls.”
US critics have been swift to disagree. In the New York Times, Emma Gilbey Keller accused Flanagan of “old-fashioned archetypes and abstractions;” at New York magazine, Meghan O’Rourke accused her of perpetuating “a tired picture of girls as victims-in-the-making;” while in a detailed takedown on Salon.com, Irin Carmon concluded: “Flanagan is too lacking in empathy and too interested in imposing the contours of her own life and her own conservative counter-rebellion to shed much light on them.”
That last piece led to an intense debate between the two women on National Public Radio’s On Point, culminating in Flanagan asking a stunned Carmon: “What could we adults have done to help you with your dating relationships [at high school]?”
The subsequent Twitter storm saw prominent US writers from the New York Times’ Rebecca Traister to the New Yorker’s Emily Nussbaum weigh in.
“I’m not sure why having a boyfriend is a measure of your health as a young woman,” tweeted Traister while Jessica Valenti, author of The Purity Myth, adding: “Wow, I’m really glad you have someone like her looking out for [...] your high-school dating life.”
The 28-year-old Carmon admits she was surprised by Flanagan’s attack.
“I didn’t expect her to try and psychoanalyze me or fix my childhood,” she says. “I feel that she spoke to me ... with contempt and profound condescension.”
For Carmon, the bigger issue remains Flanagan’s failure to place female adolescent experience in a wider context.
“Most of the e-mails I got after that interview were from fathers,” she says. “A lot of men disliked the way that she places all the responsibility on girls and women to make sure that boys and men treat them right.”
Flanagan, a self-described “pro-abortion, pro-gay rights Democrat,” is unrepentant.
“She brought her personal life into the discussion. She said: ‘I was on the Internet as a teenager and I’m fine,’” she said of Carmon. “She’s young and she’s of that sexting, hooking-up culture. And I felt it was fair enough to ask: ‘How did it go for you with boys at high school?’ I wasn’t surprised that it didn’t go well.”
Flanagan argues that her book is only divisive because people are afraid to confront the reality of the Internet.
“I think people my age — I’m 50 — are anxious not to seem fuddy duddy and so they become huge advocates of Internet use,” she said. “Girls need a time when they’re not constantly assailed by what everyone thinks about them or about what they wore to school.”
“I’m not against the Internet,” she says. “My issue is that there’s a coarsening and deadening, which I don’t think would exist without the Internet. I think this has led to an adolescent hook-up, sexting culture, which in turn means that young girls can graduate from college without having had a relationship based on more than sex. I think that lack of love or affection is hard on the female spirit.”
But isn’t this argument falling back on a tired “nice girls don’t put out” argument?
“Girls are much more in charge of their social life with boys than they realize,” she said. “Young men will do anything to get female attention and I think if you say: ‘Treat me well, I’m not sure about you, study me like a book or a movie or a concert,’ then that is what courtship culture is about.”
She refutes claims that Girl Land is saturated with nostalgia.
“It’s nonsense to say that teenage girls today don’t like romance. An entire romance industry worth billions of dollars is driven not by boys, but by adolescent girls,” she said.
As an argument, it’s not convincing. For in Flanagan’s Girl Land there are two choices: a romantic retreat into a sepia-tinted past, or a plunge into the maelstrom of girls performing oral sex on strangers. The reality is more complicated and less lurid. For boys and girls, adolescence is a time when mistakes will be made and directions changed. It’s a case of finding the way that makes life work for you. Girl Land shines more of a light on the psyche of Caitlin Flanagan than the hearts of teenage girls.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry