There was another winner in the election this weekend that handed President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) a second term in office — the faint but unmistakable clamor for democracy in China.
Thanks in large part to an uncharacteristically hands-off approach by Chinese Internet censors, the campaign between Ma and Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was avidly followed by millions of Chinese, who consumed online tidbits of election news and biting commentary that they then spit out far and wide through social media outlets.
As the election played out last Saturday, a palpable giddiness spread through the Twitter-like microblog services that have as many as 250 million members. They marveled at how smoothly the voting went, how graciously the loser, Tsai, conceded and how Ma gave his victory speech in the rain without the benefit of an underling’s umbrella — in contrast with the pampering that Chinese officials often receive.
“It’s all anyone on Weibo was talking about this weekend,” Renmin University political science professor Zhang Ming (張明) said, referring to Sina Weibo, China’s most popular microblog service.
Users expressed barbed humor about their own unelected leaders — and envy over Taiwan’s prodigious liberties — but also deeply felt pride that their putative compatriots pulled off a seamless election free of the violence that marred previous campaigns in Taiwan, including a 2004 assassination attempt against former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
“On the other side of the sea, Taiwan erected a mirror. And on this side of the sea, we saw ourselves in the future,” read one well-forwarded comment by Xu Wei, a wine expert.
The election, Taiwan’s fifth since it traded authoritarian rule for democracy in 1996, presented leaders in China with something of a challenge. While the Chinese Communist Party has long sought to portray democracy as unsuitable for the Chinese nation, it also considers Taiwan a part of China — despite a schism during which Taiwan has developed strongly-held ideas about free speech and self-determination.
To allow unfettered news media coverage of the race was out of the question, but to strangle the news online of a major international story might have provoked an uncomfortable backlash from China’s increasingly savvy Internet users. The result was schizophrenic: In contrast to the relatively freewheeling commentary found on microblogs and Internet news portals, the official press provided spare and neutered coverage of the balloting.
In its few dispatches on the race, Xinhua news agency avoided the words “democracy” and “president,” and it cast the contest as a local election, in keeping with Beijing’s stance that Taiwan is a breakaway province.
Overall, Xinhua’s reports have presented Ma’s win as a validation of Beijing’s newfound cross-strait detente, which has led to reduced tensions between the two governments, while enriching Taiwan’s economy with increased trade and tourism.
“The people of Taiwan have used their votes to express their desire for peace of mind, stability and development,” Xinhua wrote.
As is typical for politically sensitive news events, Chinese newspapers were instructed to run only Xinhua’s account of the election, but many editors appeared to make up for such constraints by running banner headlines, splashy graphics and large photographs of a triumphant, rain-soaked president.
“No one told us we couldn’t put the election on our front page, so that’s what we did,” one editor of a large daily newspaper said.
David Bandurski, a researcher at Hong Kong University’s China Media Project, said the disparity in coverage between the state media and privately owned Internet news portals suggested that officials were still unsure how to grapple with a rapidly evolving medium.
“The control regime, if you call it that, is still trying to catch up,” he said. “If their approach is too stringent, they risk a blowback.”
For those who hanker for reform, the momentary stasis was welcome. An early opening arrived last month, when Chinese found they were able to watch the presidential debates online.
Just as impressive for many were the campaign photographs that showed the candidates glad-handing in public. One image that inspired a welter of favorable reaction was an encounter between Ma and a peevish pork vendor who turned away in disgust.
“At a time like this, one can really see who is the servant and who is the master, and experience what a balanced system is,” the Chinese blogger Han Zhiguo (韓志國) wrote.
Interest in the race snowballed in recent weeks and a number of high-profile Chinese businessmen traveled to Taiwan to see the contest up close. Among them was Wang Shi (王屹), one of China’s biggest real-estate tycoons, who sent out regular microblog dispatches from political rallies.
“Everything went orderly and there were no surprises,” he wrote over the weekend to his 4 million followers. “The political environment has really matured.”
Another Chinese businessman who spent several days in Taiwan said the election had a profound impact on his understanding of politics. Seated on a plane bound for Beijing on Sunday night, he described how he had been led to believe that Taiwan’s democracy was chaotic and shallow, its elections prone to violence. Not anymore, he said.
“This is an amazing idea, to be able to choose the people who represent you,” said the man, who asked to remain nameless so he could speak without restraint. “I think democracy will come to China. It’s only a matter of time.”
However, it seems the most telling commentary on the election was a joke that had been forwarded thousands of times in recent days.
A Taiwanese man brags to his Chinese friend that he will go to the polls in the morning and know the results that evening.
“You guys are too backward,” the Chinese friend responds. “If we had to vote tomorrow morning, we would already know who is elected by tonight.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations