Housing bubble
In response to Michael Turton’s brilliant and well-researched letter, I would like to chip in with my expertise on the Taipei property market and try to explain why there is a housing bubble, but no social housing, in Taipei (Letter, Jan. 17, page 8).
First, there’s the concept of “mean reversion” that most Taiwanese investors, unlike FINI (Foreign Institutional Investor) funds, don’t seem to understand. People forget that the construction companies putting up these massive apartments have had gross margins of more than 50 percent in the last few years, putting cash in the pockets of the 1 percent and some lucky shareholders, a sure sign of mal-investment.
And what were these builders building? They’re building palaces for the mega-rich with marble walls, full-wall mirrors, large custom bathrooms and more. In some cases, four families could live fairly comfortably in one apartment. These people who think they are investing are really only speculating.
My chartered financial analyst and equity investor friend, “Mike,” went out to look at some places and he said, “they’re all super-nice, but way out of my budget.” If he says that, single and successful as he is, it is clear that there is a problem with housing in Taipei. I rent a rooftop bai-bai temple for NT$9,000 a month and consider myself lucky because my landlady living downstairs is bearish on renting it to a local, haha.
A housing “investment” that you don’t live in, unless you rent it out, is a risk. A big one. If you don’t find a buyer and sell higher, guess what you get? Pay attention to the housing catastrophe in China to see mal-investment everywhere.
What angers me is that every single law and project was approved by Taiwan’s incompetent carpetbagger government, with no consideration for the poor and, in an increasing number of cases, the environment.
Turning back the clock, I would have mandated that all new Taipei City buildings come with at least six floors of modest, but complete small apartments in a walk-up with nice balconies, the rest being up to the builder, and with an open-to-all pool, park and fitness center on each roof, loaded with solar power panels. Young, healthy singles or students could rent smaller apartments on the fifth and sixth floors, with families and the elderly below.
This building would have small shops on the bottom available for rent at reasonable rates. If all the recently-built super towers were like this, the price for retail space would not be going up. Don’t forget that Taiwan’s insurance industry is getting 3 percent returns on rent. With housing like I’m describing, if you build it, they will come.
The corrupt 1 percenters in the legislature have always passed laws that distort the market in many ways, allow land grabs at times just before harvest and drive profits their way. Don’t get me started on the National Stabilization Fund.
I strongly believe that the first countries that start to mark-to-market, instead of mark to disgraced financier Bernie Madoff, will be long-term winners. This Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government needs to come clean about the nation’s true sovereign deficit and adopt new policies that will help us with the inevitable reversion to the mean in the property market. That said, the luxury tax is working well, in my view, to get speculators out.
On a discouraging note, several weeks ago, a politician was talking about a new project, saying, “And the land for this social housing project will be sold to the highest bidder!” while he was dancing around in a paper-profits-induced jig and wringing his hands, according to a Google translation. Is this the KMT’s winning strategy for keeping the price down to help the poor in Taiwan?
Watch how this plays out in China. The “wealth effect” is so strong that not even I am immune. The minute any held-only property reaches parity on a downward slope, speculators and others who rode the uptrend will immediately stop spending and run for cover.
The world’s largest mall is empty, people. Mean reversion can be tough.
Torch Pratt
New Taipei City
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.