Laws to fight vote buying
I was born in Taiwan. Although I am now living in the US, I still pray that freedom and justice can prevail in Taiwan. One month before the recent presidential election, I called a relative in Taiwan. I told her that Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) appeared headed for victory, based on the news I saw on the Internet. However, she was not sure. She said that many people she knew had already received vote-buying money from a powerful political party. Now it appeared that she was right. Vote buying is a shame of Taiwan.
In the US, there is the Money Laundering Control Act as well as Suspicious Activity Reports to fight such acts. Any cash transaction of more than US$10,000 has to be automatically reported by the bank to relevant regulatory agencies. This is designed to make it difficult for illegal activities to evade detection.
I hope that Taiwan will soon fully implement similar laws and regulations to make it more difficult for rich political parties to buy votes with cash in any election. God bless Taiwan!
Chin Lee
Centennial, Colorado
Biological pest controls
Experts recently lamented the continuing use of rodenticides in Taiwan, which are toxins used to kill rodents (“Researchers urge poison-free rat-control measures,” Jan. 11, page 2). These dangerous chemicals are toxic to wildlife and humans, causing death through poisoning or cancer, and are one of the leading causes of the decline and likely extinction of the Taiwanese subspecies of the Australasian grass owl, the other causes being habitat loss, pesticide use and bird nets (“Experts fear for Australasian grass owl,” Oct. 1, 2011, page 2).
As usual, agriculturalists defend the use of rodenticides, claiming that there is no alternative to protect crops, while scientists claim they need “more knowledge about the Australasian grass owl’s behavior, current population and the state of its habitat.”
However, there is a proven method for battling rodents and protecting owls at the same time. In an excellent video on YouTube (www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJDVohcnfHQ), the use of barn owls and kestrels as biological control agents in Israel and Jordan shows that the introduction of barn owls increased crop yields by up to 24 percent, which adds up to an annual net profit of US$30 per hectare.
By placing thousands of nest boxes for barn owls and kestrels all over the Israeli countryside, these two bird species quickly decimated the rodent population and thus eliminated the need for rodenticides during the past decade.
A pair of barn owls catches between 2,000 to 5,000 rodents a year, but they are often limited by the number of available nest boxes. However, when nest boxes were provided and prey poisoning was stopped, this method of biological control was successfully employed in India, Malaysia, South Africa and the US, and has been used for protecting various crops such as alfalfa, citrus fruits, cocoa, dates, nuts, oil palms, rice, sugar cane, vine and wheat. Just do a Google search of “owl biological control.” There are now even commercial firms offering barn owls and purpose-built nests to farmers.
Farming organizations, nature conservation groups and the Taiwanese government should support more research and application of biological control methods because they create a typical win-win situation of sustainable ecosystem management: Biodiversity and farming revenues go up, while pollution and farming costs go down. What is there not to like about this?
Flora Faun
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with