Taiwan’s trash troubles
The Taipei Times should be commended for raising the problem of plastic waste in a recent op-ed piece (“The global hunger for plastic packaging creates endless garbage,” Jan. 4, page 9). Plastic waste is now ubiquitous — walk around any public park, along any river, street or on any beach in Taiwan and non-degradable waste, mostly plastic, will be lying around everywhere.
I once counted the number of plastic items along a 1km stretch of a small river in central Taiwan — 23 large items and more than 200 small items. Plastic does not degrade for centuries or maybe even millenia and much of it ends up in the world’s oceans, such as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch (Google it). This waste is suffocating coral reefs as well as killing small and large marine life, including endangered turtles, sea birds and mammals.
While Taiwan has reasonably good recycling rates, there are two problems. First, non-degradable waste, whether it is greenhouse gases or plastic waste, by definition accumulates in the environment faster than it degrades.
Therefore, even if we lower greenhouse gas emissions substantially or increase recycling rates tenfold the problem will only be delayed, but not solved. The solution is to get rid of the problem substance, as the Cradle-to-Cradle approach recommends (www.mcdonough.com/cradle_to_cradle.htm).
The second problem is more specific to Taiwan: Since people have to pay to dispose of their trash, poorer people are less willing to pay the cost as it consumes a larger amount of their small budgets. Therefore, poor people perceive it as an unfair and unnecessary cost, and are increasingly disposing of their trash by throwing it into rivers and by the side of the road.
Walk around Taipei’s small forest streets and rivers, and you can see the amounts of garbage growing by the day. Therefore, economic inequality, which is increasing in Taiwan, will make recycling much harder to achieve.
It is lamentable that during the din of the presidential election, discussion of environment problems has, as usual, gotten lost in the fray. Serious discussions of problems such as these have been rare, mostly focused on nuclear energy and greenhouse gases, and mostly drowned out by the various deplorable smear campaigns. Environmental problems are not just global warming — there are dozens of accumulating and non-degradable environmental problem substances, such as dioxins, heavy metals and so on, all of which we should worry about very much.
Sadly, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) re-soling his shoes gets more news traction than real environmental problems.
Flora Faun
Taipei
Civil liberties trump capital
Business tycoons have pretty much all come out in support of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which should not surprise anyone, because China has a cheap labor market and huge consumer base they covet, and of course, the authoritarian oligarchy in Beijing can make their lives quite miserable if they do not sing the right tune. All the Chinese government needs to do is to accuse one firm of environmental damage or unfavorable working condition and the precious factory would have to close down.
The irony is that barely 35 years ago, most of the tycoons would have been shot by either the KMT for treason or by the Chinese Communist Party for being capitalists, but today, Taiwan is a thriving democracy with freedom of speech guaranteed for everyone, so let’s move on and not dwell on the hideous history of China (both the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of China).
Maybe we should not be too hard on the business tycoons: Joint stock companies have not changed much since their conception in early modern Europe. They are designed to do one thing and that is maximize profit for their shareholders.
Wherever they are, they are primarily answerable to their shareholders and only after the shareholders’ interests are taken care of, do the interests of the workers come into the picture. So we really should not blame the chief executives for doing what they are supposed to do; they are businesspeople and not saints, which is why we should all be grateful that none of them is running for president.
It is important to recognize that business interests are not always congruent with national interest and that for the most part, the interests of those holding the capital run counter to the interests of workers.
So the only question Taiwanese should ask is: “Which government will look out for my interests and protect my civil liberty?”
It is not the government’s job to look out for the interests of the multinationals; not at the expense of the 95 percent anyway.
In 1996, Taiwanese stood defiant against China and their missiles. Taiwanese did it again in 2000, and today the nation’s democracy is again under threat.
On Saturday, Taiwanese can choose like the business tycoons to kowtow to China or they can send a clear message to tell China that holding our nation’s business interests hostage will not work, because in a democracy, the public’s civil liberty should be, and is, more precious than businesses’ offshore capital.
Chi-hung Luke Hsieh
Riverside, California
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing