Taiwan’s trash troubles
The Taipei Times should be commended for raising the problem of plastic waste in a recent op-ed piece (“The global hunger for plastic packaging creates endless garbage,” Jan. 4, page 9). Plastic waste is now ubiquitous — walk around any public park, along any river, street or on any beach in Taiwan and non-degradable waste, mostly plastic, will be lying around everywhere.
I once counted the number of plastic items along a 1km stretch of a small river in central Taiwan — 23 large items and more than 200 small items. Plastic does not degrade for centuries or maybe even millenia and much of it ends up in the world’s oceans, such as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch (Google it). This waste is suffocating coral reefs as well as killing small and large marine life, including endangered turtles, sea birds and mammals.
While Taiwan has reasonably good recycling rates, there are two problems. First, non-degradable waste, whether it is greenhouse gases or plastic waste, by definition accumulates in the environment faster than it degrades.
Therefore, even if we lower greenhouse gas emissions substantially or increase recycling rates tenfold the problem will only be delayed, but not solved. The solution is to get rid of the problem substance, as the Cradle-to-Cradle approach recommends (www.mcdonough.com/cradle_to_cradle.htm).
The second problem is more specific to Taiwan: Since people have to pay to dispose of their trash, poorer people are less willing to pay the cost as it consumes a larger amount of their small budgets. Therefore, poor people perceive it as an unfair and unnecessary cost, and are increasingly disposing of their trash by throwing it into rivers and by the side of the road.
Walk around Taipei’s small forest streets and rivers, and you can see the amounts of garbage growing by the day. Therefore, economic inequality, which is increasing in Taiwan, will make recycling much harder to achieve.
It is lamentable that during the din of the presidential election, discussion of environment problems has, as usual, gotten lost in the fray. Serious discussions of problems such as these have been rare, mostly focused on nuclear energy and greenhouse gases, and mostly drowned out by the various deplorable smear campaigns. Environmental problems are not just global warming — there are dozens of accumulating and non-degradable environmental problem substances, such as dioxins, heavy metals and so on, all of which we should worry about very much.
Sadly, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) re-soling his shoes gets more news traction than real environmental problems.
Flora Faun
Taipei
Civil liberties trump capital
Business tycoons have pretty much all come out in support of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which should not surprise anyone, because China has a cheap labor market and huge consumer base they covet, and of course, the authoritarian oligarchy in Beijing can make their lives quite miserable if they do not sing the right tune. All the Chinese government needs to do is to accuse one firm of environmental damage or unfavorable working condition and the precious factory would have to close down.
The irony is that barely 35 years ago, most of the tycoons would have been shot by either the KMT for treason or by the Chinese Communist Party for being capitalists, but today, Taiwan is a thriving democracy with freedom of speech guaranteed for everyone, so let’s move on and not dwell on the hideous history of China (both the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of China).
Maybe we should not be too hard on the business tycoons: Joint stock companies have not changed much since their conception in early modern Europe. They are designed to do one thing and that is maximize profit for their shareholders.
Wherever they are, they are primarily answerable to their shareholders and only after the shareholders’ interests are taken care of, do the interests of the workers come into the picture. So we really should not blame the chief executives for doing what they are supposed to do; they are businesspeople and not saints, which is why we should all be grateful that none of them is running for president.
It is important to recognize that business interests are not always congruent with national interest and that for the most part, the interests of those holding the capital run counter to the interests of workers.
So the only question Taiwanese should ask is: “Which government will look out for my interests and protect my civil liberty?”
It is not the government’s job to look out for the interests of the multinationals; not at the expense of the 95 percent anyway.
In 1996, Taiwanese stood defiant against China and their missiles. Taiwanese did it again in 2000, and today the nation’s democracy is again under threat.
On Saturday, Taiwanese can choose like the business tycoons to kowtow to China or they can send a clear message to tell China that holding our nation’s business interests hostage will not work, because in a democracy, the public’s civil liberty should be, and is, more precious than businesses’ offshore capital.
Chi-hung Luke Hsieh
Riverside, California
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China