On Jan. 1, the government raised the monthly minimum wage, but just as workers were about to start cheering, some households suddenly found that they have lost their status as low-income households.
Taiwan is not a social welfare state, but employs a system of “work welfare.” To avoid creating dependence on welfare subsidies, Article 5-1 of the Public Assistance Act (社會救助法) states that a salary — a so-called “virtual income” — shall be calculated for those who are capable of working, but are unemployed.
The calculation for this virtual income moves with the base salary, but for those between the ages of 16 and 20, as well as those between the ages of 60 and 65, the calculated income shall be 70 percent of their virtual income.
The calculated income for the physically or mentally challenged shall be 55 percent of their virtual income.
Let us use an unemployed physically or mentally challenged person as an example.
In the past, when the monthly minimum wage was NT$17,880, their calculated wage would be NT$9,834. With the exception of Kinmen and Lianjiang counties, the figure did not exceed the publicly announced lowest living expenses in any area in Taiwan.
Now that the monthly minimum wage has been increased by 5.03 percent to NT$18,780, the virtual income of an unemployed physically or mentally challenged person has been increased by NT$495, to NT$10,329.
This is more than NT$10,244, the publicly announced lowest living expenses in Taiwan Province and in Greater Tainan, and NT$10,303, the publicly announced lowest living expenses in Greater Taichung.
In other words, physically or mentally challenged people in these three areas have lost their low-income status simply because their virtual income has exceeded the lowest living expenses by NT$26 or NT$85. This places them in a difficult situation because they will no longer be eligible for government subsidies.
The Public Assistance Act includes rules for excluding someone who cannot find work from those who are capable of working, but these regulations only apply to someone who has had a permanent employer.
If these unemployed people can provide proof of unemployment to a public employment service center within two years, and if they are unable to find work, they are entitled to receive unemployment payments and to be excluded from those who are capable of working.
Someone who has insurance with a professional association — 4 million people are not covered by the Employment Insurance Act (就業保險法) — or someone who has been unemployed for more than two years will be determined to have a salary regardless of whether they are employed or not — the virtual income mentioned earlier.
This design is contradictory. Even as such disadvantaged groups as workers in atypical employment, those in long-term unemployment, and physically and mentally challenged individuals come under greater pressure, it becomes more difficult to provide care for those in need through Taiwan’s social security system.
Wang Yu-ling is secretary-general of the League of Welfare Organizations for the Disabled.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China