Vote with your free will
The recent American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) announcement that Taiwan has been nominated for the US’ visa-waiver program (“Taiwan gets US visa-waiver nomination,” Dec. 23, page 1) is a biasing move and it has added another perturbation to next month’s elections.
In the 2008 presidential election, the AIT made a similar mistake by announcing that Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) did not have a US green card, although many people still believe he has. Advocating fair elections, the US should remain neutral. The nomination for the visa-waiver program is not so urgent that it had to be announced at this time.
If the US approves the nomination, it is because Taiwanese have credibility. They should thank themselves — not the incumbent or previous administration.
In addition to the US announcement of the visa-waiver nomination, several other perturbations might affect the elections. These include Beijing urging Taiwanese businesspersons in China to vote for Ma, a 50 percent discount on their airfare to return to vote, the smear campaign against Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), an imbalance in party funds, and possible vote-buying and betting on the results.
All voters should ignore these disturbing factors and cast their votes with their free will for their own sake and for the future of their homeland.
The sustainability of democracy and the normalization of Taiwan depend on next month’s elections.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
A local angle
In the run-up to next month’s elections, although it is interesting to see how the two main political parties continuously attack each other about procedures and any way that the other may possibly be breaking the law, aren’t Taiwanese more interested in the political decisions and political strategies that may involve real issues?
Or is how to trip the other party up the only important thing in elections?
There seems to be a lack of information about policy decisions, plans or even ideas that reflect the distinctions between the main parties. Also lacking is any real effort to focus on key issues in an intellectual manner or through deeper discussion. Instead, taking up most of the front pages are oversized photos of presidential candidates and trivial information, such as who gave Ma some vegetables.
Please, less drivel and more intellectual debate on core electoral issues. Here is a radical idea — instead of Americans speculating from the US, why not have some Taiwanese intellectuals speculating from inside the country on how the election will effect Taiwanese?
disillusioned
(name withheld)
Speaking the truth
It was with a certain amount of disbelief and disgust that I read about the remarks of Taipei City Councilor Angela Ying (應曉薇) (“Activists slam ‘cleaning’ up of homeless,” Dec. 24, page 4). It is hard to believe that she could show such a lack of empathy and caring for the disadvantaged of Taipei.
The words she used were no joke! They were coarse, crude and totally without feeling. However, it also proves that the divide between the “haves” and the “have nots” is widening, and those who have care less and less about their more unfortunate brethren.
This is not just something peculiar to Taiwan. The US is seeing that gap widen every day.
Maybe Ying should think of the old adage: “There but by the grace of God,” and then hold her tongue when she is feeling particularly fortunate.
Tom Kuleck
Taichung City
Righting wrongs
I receive the European edition of Time magazine at home and I was shocked to see Taiwan shown as part of China in its geographic illustration, as Dan Bloom reported in his recent article (“Setting confused ‘Time’ straight,” Dec. 28, page 8).
I actually did write an e-mail to Time to signal this obvious error. Although my letter was not published, I was pleased to see that the error had been corrected on the magazine’s Web site and that Jesse Chaflin’s letter was published in the Dec. 12 issue of the European edition.
Dan Bloom’s statement that “his letter did not appear in Time’s other international editions for North America and Europe” is therefore wrong and should be corrected.
Joseph Allard
Luxembourg
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under