This time last year, I was in Khartoum, scouring Arabic TV channels trying to find any reports of events in Tunisia. Twitter and a few blog posts in Arabic and French were reporting that a man had allegedly burned himself alive and protests were erupting throughout the country. There was nothing.
Today, the Arab Spring dominates the Arab airwaves. Egypt in particular, where the awakening flowered with the removal of former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak, occupies the Arab psyche as a bellwether, a litmus test of how this new political phase is progressing. In a few months, the Egyptian revolution and its aftermath have witnessed a resurgent dictatorship in the shape of the military junta, an intransigent old guard, the trial of the former president, parliamentary elections and the subsequent victory of the Muslim Brotherhood.
If there were ever an Arab country that displayed the full gamut of elements and interlocutors that constitute the random mix that is the contemporary Arabic polity, it is Egypt.
However, the country’s most important contribution to the Arab Spring has been in delivering a dose of reality, a promotion of a politically mature understanding that things will take time. Far from demoralizing, events in Egypt are refocusing people on the importance of thinking beyond the toppling of presidents.
The latest round of disturbances over the past few weeks has been widely referred to as Egypt’s revolution “2.0;” a second wave after the first revolution was “stillborn.” Given the sacrifices before and the euphoria after the ousting of Mubarak, it is dispiriting to see the same scenes play out again in Cairo, with arrests, killings and harassment of women dominating the news from the country.
The Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), the military council in charge, has been given a chance and proved that it is cut of the same cloth as its predecessor. However, the current wave of protests represents a different dynamic. We are beginning to see a shift away from one-way diktat to real politics. The military now knows that it cannot call the shots indefinitely.
Far from being frustrating, this new dynamic is encouraging. It would have been an abortion if the new regime were welcomed unquestioningly, as far more acceptable than the previous, and the Egyptian people slipped back into the Mubarak-era malaise of surrendering civic rights.
It displays a covetousness, a monitoring of the aftermath of the revolution and a knowledge and determination to ensure that it is not aborted. Commentator Firas al Attrachi refers to it as “a new social contract.” He states that “events in Tahrir Square, to some extent in January/February and more so in the past week, have forced the foundation of a new social contract along the lines of how nations were formed during the Greek city-state era,” redefining the relationship between people and government, and the very meaning of citizenship in the country.
In the absolute rejection of any government other than a civilian one, Egyptian protesters and activists show they are no longer willing to accept political smoke and mirrors. To the rest of us in the Arab world watching the events unfold, it appears nothing short of a miracle that, almost overnight, Egypt went from an ostensibly inert political environment to one where the most established regime in the region was toppled, to one where, without skipping a beat, there has emerged a lively and robust political dynamic. One that teaches us that it is not just individuals that must be overthrown, but that there also must be a purging of the old guard. The day-to-day events on the ground are arresting and amplified, but rather than taking the wind out of the Arab awakening’s sails, they give succour.
There is a perception that this new presence in Tahrir and on the streets of Cairo is disembodied, no longer an avant garde for the nation’s sentiment.
“Egypt is not Tahrir Square,” SCAF declared.
However, this does not necessarily imply support for SCAF. A weak political class “stumbling around the middle ground trying to capitalize on piecemeal concessions” from the military has been circumvented and protesters and political activists are now going about it the only way they know: bottom up.
The electoral victory of the Muslim Brotherhood in the first round of parliamentary elections was what the naysayers have been waiting for. The Islamic bogeyman rearing its ugly head, ready to cannibalize the hard-won spoils of the revolution. However, the Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice party has made it clear that a swift end to military rule is a top priority, echoing the national sentiment that the army must return to the barracks.
As in Tunisia, victorious Islamic parties seem to be treading the transition waters carefully, in a curative function under the watchful eye of a flammable electorate. Having been the only consistent vehicle of opposition during the Mubarak era, it was to be expected that Islamic parties would be best poised for electoral victory, as was Ennahda in Tunisia. This does not necessarily reflect a more religiously conservative bent. It is still a worrying development for liberals, though, and there is trepidation that an overwhelmingly secular revolution will segue into Islamic governance in the absence of civil leaders of the revolution.
This is a political dynamic, not a revolutionary one. It’s fragmented and messy, and many within Egypt and across the Arab world crave stability, but appreciate that the ongoing volatility is still necessary. Things will almost certainly get worse before they get better, but we are seeing the vital signs of a revolution that is far from stillborn. If anything, the revolution is alive and kicking, taking its first gulps of air in a political atmosphere where Arabs are now learning to negotiate the post-dictator era.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under